i.
Expected savings per year, expected life and
Answer to Problem 38P
Expected savings per year is $1980, expected life is 6 years and rate of return for the expected values is 12.18%.
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Cost of robot = $81000
Probability for optimistic annual savings of $22000 is 0.1
Probability for pessimistic annual savings of $18000 is 0.2
Probability for most likely annual savings of $20000 is 0.7
Probability for optimistic useful life of 4 year is 1/6
Probability for pessimistic useful life of 12 years is 2/3
Probability for most likely useful life of 5 year is 1/6.
Calculation:
Expected Savings (EAS):
=
Expected Saving - $19800
Expected Useful Life:
=
Hence, expected useful life is 6 years
Rate of return (RR) for optimistic:
Present value can be calculated as follows:
Interest rate = 12%
As calculated value is equal to actual Value, thus rate of return is 12.18%.
Conclusion:
Expected savings per year is $1980, expected life is 6 years and rate of return for the expected values is 12.18%.
ii.
Expected rate of return for combination of savings per year and life.
Answer to Problem 38P
Expected rate of return for combination of savings per year and life is 10.48%.
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Cost of robot = $81000
Probability for optimistic annual savings of $22000 is 0.1
Probability for pessimistic annual savings of $18000 is 0.2
Probability for most likely annual savings of $20000 is 0.7
Probability for optimistic useful life of 4 year is 1/6
Probability for pessimistic useful life of 12 years is 2/3
Probability for most likely useful life of 5 year is 1/6.
Calculation:
Expected rate of return for combination of savings per year and life:
Interest rate = 11%
When interest rate is substituted as 11%, then calculated value is less than the actual value. Thus decrease interest rate further. If 10.84% is substituted, then actual value is equivalent to calculated value.
Conclusion:
Thus, 10.84% is rate of return for combination of savings per year.
iii.
Answers for part a and b match or not.
Answer to Problem 38P
Answers donot match.
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Cost of robot = $81000
Probability for optimistic annual savings of $22000 is 0.1
Probability for pessimistic annual savings of $18000 is 0.2
Probability for most likely annual savings of $20000 is 0.7
Probability for optimistic useful life of 4 year is 1/6
Probability for pessimistic useful life of 12 years is 2/3
Probability for most likely useful life of 5 year is 1/6.
Concept used:
Since time period varies in part a and part b, rate of return for part a and part b are different.
Conclusion:
Answers donot match.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
- 1. Homemade Lasagna and the Pursuit for Knowledge Your sister, Jamila, a newly appointed human resource manager at a fast-growing assisted living facility, was sitting with you at the dinner table. While you were enjoying a homemade Lasagna and watching TV together, a news report stated that "According to government officials, we are now headed into a recession that could last up to 10 months. The decline in economic activities is expected to affect all major industries." Your sister raised her eyebrows and showed an expression of confusion as she looked at you and stated, "Oh dear, what should I do now as an HR manager? My company is opening a large facility in a couple of months, and we need at least 60 people to run it. I oversee finding those people, but now I am afraid of doing so because it looks like the economy is in trouble. So, dear brother, help me understand a couple of things:" First, what on earth is a “recession”, and how does it affect the economy? Do things become…arrow_forwardConsider the simple discrete job search model that we studied in class. Only the unemployed can receive one offer per period from F(w) that is a uniform distribution on [0,2]. There is a constant probability of being laid off at the end of each period while employed. Assume that she can get a new offer right away when laid off. We want to understand the reservation wage, WR, in this model. Assume that u(c) = c. The parameters are a discount factor ẞ and an unemployment benefit b.R and show that T is contraction on [0, ∞). Explicitly state any additional assumptions that you may need.(Grading guide line: 5pt for the exact form of T, 10pt for showing contraction, and 5pt for stating correct assumptions.)< (b) Discuss why (a) is useful to understand the reservation wage wд in this economy.< (c) We write WR = WR (b,ẞ,λ) to reveal its dependence on (b,ẞ,λ). Show that 0 ≤ aWR дь OWR дл ≤1 and ≥0. What about ? awR ав State any additional assumptions that you may need.< (d) Briefly explain the…arrow_forward3. Consider the market for paper. The process of producing paper creates pollution. Assume that the marginal damage function for pollution is given by: MDF = 3E where damages are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. Assume further that the function describing the marginal abatement cost of emissions is given by MAC 120-E where benefits are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. a. Graph the marginal damage function (MDF) and the marginal abatement cost function (MAC). b. What is the unregulated level of emissions Eu? What is the social welfare of this emissions level? c. Assume an existing emission quota limits emissions to E = 60. Show on the graph why this policy is inefficient. What is the deadweight loss caused by this policy?arrow_forward
- show written calculation for Barrow_forwardProblem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forwardd-farrow_forward
- G please!arrow_forward4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forwardDon't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- Thanks in advance!arrow_forwardI need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education