The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Problem 6. The circular plate shown rotates about its vertical diameter. At the instant shown, the angular velocity ₁ of the plate is 10 rad/s and is decreasing at the rate of 25 rad/s². The disk lies in the XY plane and Point D of strap CD moves upward. The relative speed u of Point D of strap CD is 1.5 m/s and is decreasing at the rate of 3 m/s². Determine (a) the velocity of D, (b) the acceleration of D. Answers: =0.75 +1.299]-1.732k m/s a=-28.6 +3.03-10.67k m/s² 200 mm x Z

Problem 1. The flywheel A has an angular velocity o 5 rad/s. Link AB is connected via ball and socket joints to the flywheel at A and a slider at B. Find the angular velocity of link AB and the velocity of slider B at this instant. (Partial Answer: @ABN = -2î + 2.25; red Z -1.2 ft C -7 Y -1.5 ft- B 2.0 ft

Need help please

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.

Answer 6

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.

Answer 7

Chapter 10, Problem 1RQ

To determine

The advantages of Frequency response techniques over Root Locus technique.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Root locus represents the path of closed loop poles of given transfer function in s-plane as the system parameter changes whereas, frequency response represents the steady state response of given system for a sinusoidal input function.

The advantages of the Frequency response techniques compared to Root Locus technique are:

Sinusoidal test signal for various ranges of frequencies and amplitude are easily available, thus the experimental determination of frequency response is easily accomplished and most reliable but in case of in Root Locus it is hard to extract sinusoidal inputs.
In Root Locus, if the characteristic equation is complex or contain power of “e” cannot be evaluated but in Frequency Response technique such type of transfer function can be exactly applied and evaluated.
The design and parameter adjustment of open loop transfer function of a system for a specified closed loop performance can be carried out easily in Frequency domain as compared to Time domain.
The Root Locus technique is its inability to deal with the difficulty in dealing with time deal whereas Frequency Response handles correctly the time delays.