The people D, S, B and a teenage boy were casted away in the sea on a lifeboat due to a storm. The only means of sustenance they had was two pounds of turnip which eventually got finished. So, D proposed to sacrifice one of the four persons on the boat for further sustenance, to which S agreed but B disagreed. The boy was ignored. The following day, D killed the boy who had become quite weak, and all three fed on him for survival until they were saved four days later by an ongoing boat. After being rescued, they were put to trial for the murder of the boy in England. To Explain: The possibility of three survivors to be subjected to penalties as per English criminal law given their unique circumstances.

Question

Consider the given situation: David was walking through a subway station that was highly crowded. He took out his handgun and fired it randomly because he liked the sound made by the firing. Even though David has no intent to shot anyone in the crowd, the shot fired by him injured Susan. David will be held liable for which type of tort? a) Negligence b) Strict liability c) Intentional tort d) Recklessness Answer Submit O O O O

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 6BCP

Summary Introduction

Case Summary: The people D, S, B and a teenage boy were casted away in the sea on a lifeboat due to a storm. The only means of sustenance they had was two pounds of turnip which eventually got finished. So, D proposed to sacrifice one of the four persons on the boat for further sustenance, to which S agreed but B disagreed. The boy was ignored. The following day, D killed the boy who had become quite weak, and all three fed on him for survival until they were saved four days later by an ongoing boat. After being rescued, they were put to trial for the murder of the boy in England.

To Explain: The possibility of three survivors to be subjected to penalties as per English criminal law given their unique circumstances.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Consider the given situation: David was walking through a subway station that was highly crowded. He took out his handgun and fired it randomly because he liked the sound made by the firing. Even though David has no intent to shot anyone in the crowd, the shot fired by him injured Susan. David will be held liable for which type of tort? a) Negligence b) Strict liability c) Intentional tort d) Recklessness Answer Submit O O O O

A statute requiring railroads to fence their tracks is construed as intended solely to prevent animals that stray onto the right-of-way from being hit by trains. B&A Railroad Company fails to fence its tracks. Two of Calvin’s cows wander onto the track. Nellie is hit by a train. Elsie is poisoned by weeds growing beside the track. For which cow(s), if any, is B&A Railroad Company liable to Calvin? Why?

Immar Medrano was employed as a journeyman electrician by Marshall Electrical Contracting, Inc. (MEC), in Marshall, Missouri. Medrano attended an electrician apprenticeship night class at a community college in Sedalia, Missouri. MEC paid Medrano’s tuition and book fees. Attendance at the course required Medrano to drive 70 miles round-trip. One night, when Medrano was driving home from the class, a drunk driver crossed the center line of U.S. Highway 65 and collided head-on with Medrano’s automobile. Medrano died in the accident. His wife and two children filed a workers’ compensation claim for death benefits against MEC. Are Medrano’s actions at the time of the automobile accident within the course and scope of his employment, thus entitling him to workers’ compensation benefits? Explain your answer.