Macroeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260506891
Author: Colander
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 5IP
(a)
To determine
Explain, if someone hurt, should always be honest or not.
(b)
To determine
Explain what strategy should be used to avoid the problem.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose there are two individuals, Casey and Rick, who live in a very simplified world where only two goods are produced and consumed; rice and beans. The production opportunity cost for Casey is 4.00kg of rice for every kilogram of beans. Rick has a production opportunity cost of 2.00 kg of rice for every kilogram of beans. Casey eventually realizes that, through trade, both individuals can be better off. Rick is willing to trade. What price can be settled between these two parties such that both individuals can enjoy more rice and beans?
You go to the movieplex where movies ordinarily cost $9. You are
intending to see a movie for which you have a $3 off coupon, which is
good for only that movie at that time. However, when you get there you
see a friend who asks if you would rather see a new release. Both
movies start and end at the same time. If you decide to see the new
release with your friend, what is your opportunity cost? a. The amount
you value the first movie + $9 b. $3 c. The amount you value the first
movie + $3 d. $9
See Hint
Suppose you have a choice to go to a Katy Perry concert or a Lady Gaga concert on Friday night. You won a free
ticket to see Katy Perry. You would pay as much as $160.00 to see Lady Gaga perform, but a ticket to her show
costs $140.00. Suppose a friend offers you $65.00 for the Katy Perry ticket.
The opportunity cost of going to the Katy Perry concert is $
Chapter 1 Solutions
Macroeconomics
Ch. 1.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 1.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 1 - Prob. 1QECh. 1 - Prob. 2QECh. 1 - Prob. 3QECh. 1 - Prob. 4QECh. 1 - Prob. 5QECh. 1 - Prob. 6QECh. 1 - Prob. 7QECh. 1 - Prob. 8QECh. 1 - Prob. 9QECh. 1 - Prob. 10QECh. 1 - Prob. 11QECh. 1 - Prob. 12QECh. 1 - Prob. 13QECh. 1 - Prob. 14QECh. 1 - Prob. 15QECh. 1 - Prob. 16QECh. 1 - Prob. 17QECh. 1 - Prob. 18QECh. 1 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 1 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 1 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 1 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 1 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 1 - Prob. 6QAPCh. 1 - Prob. 1IPCh. 1 - Prob. 2IPCh. 1 - Prob. 3IPCh. 1 - Prob. 4IPCh. 1 - Prob. 5IPCh. 1 - Prob. 6IPCh. 1 - Prob. 7IPCh. 1 - Prob. 8IPCh. 1 - Prob. 9IPCh. 1 - Prob. 10IPCh. 1 - Prob. 11IPCh. 1 - Prob. 12IPCh. 1 - Prob. 13IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Like a good economist, you calculated the opportunity cost of getting your college degree. Suppose that at your university, you will pay $15,000 each year for tuition, $3,000 each year for textbooks, and $8,000 per year for room and board. Before you left for college, your boss at your high-school job offered you a job paying $15,000 per year.Assume that if you decided not to go to college, your parents would not let you live at home.What is your opportunity cost for four years of college? $____arrow_forwardAna and Ivan each individually and simultaneously decide whether to spend the evening at a play or a concert. Ana prefers to attend the concert twice as much without Ivan than to attend the play without him, and she prefers this three times more than being in the same place with Ivan (and at that point, she doesn't care where they are). Ivan prefers being in the same place with Ana twice as much as being at the play without her, and he prefers this four times more than being without Ana at the concert. Both have von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) preferences. With what probability will Ivan choose to attend the concert in Nashe's equilibrium?arrow_forwardwhich seems to be correct?arrow_forward
- Which of these situations describe an equilibrium, and which does not? If not, what would an equilibrium look like? Remember that the definition of equilibrium means, in part, that there is no incentive or push/pull to change from the current described state. Many people regularly commute from the suburbs to the downtown area of a local city. Due to traffic congestion, the trip takes 30 minutes when you travel by highway, and15 when you go by side streets. There are 2 gas stations at the intersection of Main and Vine. One charges $3.75 for regular and the other charges $3.25. Customers can get gas immediately at the first station, but must wait in long lines at the second. Every student who enrolls in econ principles must also attend a weekly tutorial. This semester, 2 sections are offered, which meet at the same time, in adjoining classrooms and are taught by equally competent and liked instructors. Section A is overcrowded with people sitting on the floor and unable to see the board…arrow_forwardWhat is the opportunity cost in this example? “ To begin, I began selling prints of my pictures in 2019 throughout 2020. It's now closed. USPS and UPS were the options I had during this period to ship out orders. Smaller or lighter packages were more expensive to ship with UPS, but USPS provided a low-cost alternative. UPS ships more than 220 internationally, whereas; USPS is strict about shipping to specific international destinations. I have chosen USPS over UPS; by doing this, orders were delivered on time and without damage by the United States Postal Service.”arrow_forwardYou have decided to specialize in gathering firewood while Friday has specialized in fishing. Your time allocation sliders are set to allocate all of your time to gathering firewood. Now, use the additional sliders to state how many logs you will trade to Friday and how many fish you want in return. You must select a trade that make both you and Friday better off than you were before specialization and trading. In other words, you must both receive more than 2000 calories of fish and 32 logs of firewood. Both you and Friday’s consumption point is displayed on the PPF graphs as you adjust the trade.arrow_forward
- Catherine wins a non-transferable, non-refudnable ticket to attend Saturday's baseball game. Taylor plans to attend the same game, but she knows from experience she can purchase a $40 ticket the day of the game. On the day of the game, it is cold with off-and-on rain showers, weather that both Catherine and Taylor equally dislike, making the prospect of attending the game less attractive than before. If both Catherine and Taylor have the same tastes and rational: a. Is one of them more likely to attend the baseball game than the other? b. Instead of winning a ticket, assume that last week Catherine paid $40 for the non-trasnferable, non-refundable ticket to Saturday's game. Would this change whether or not one of them is more likely to attend the baseball game?arrow_forwardJulia and Ralph need to decide which one of them will take time off from work to complete the rather urgent task of pruning their trees. Julia is pretty good with a pole saw; she can prune the trees in 1 hour. Ralph is somewhat slow; it takes him 6 hours to prune the trees. Julia earns $120 per hour as a business consultant, while Ralph earns $15 per hour as a lifeguard.Keeping in mind that either Julia or Ralph must take time off from work to prune the trees, who has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task?arrow_forwardSue Tom Good A 10 4 Select one: Good B 15 5 As shown in the table above, Sue and Tom each can produce two different types of goods. For Sue, if she only produces Good A, then she can produce 10 units of Good A per day. If she only produces Good B, then she can produce 15 units of Good B per day. For Tom, if he only produces Good A, then she can produce 4 units of Good A per day. If she only produces Good B, then she can produce 5 units of Good B per day. Which of the following statement is correct about comparative advantage? O a. Tom has a comparative advantage over Sue in the production of Good A. Sue has a comparative advantage over Tom in the production of Good B O b. Tom has a comparative advantage over Sue in both tasks O c. Sue has a comparative advantage over Tom in both tasks O d. Sue has a comparative advantage over Tom in the production of Good A. Tom has a comparative advantage over Sue in the production of Good Barrow_forward
- a) Draw a production possibilities frontier (PPF) for a society that produces two goods, guns and wheat. Suppose this society has two political parties, party R (who want a strong military) and party L (who want a smaller military). Show points on your diagram that party R and party L chooses. b) Show graphically whether your PPF will change if all the resources used for both the goods were equally suitable for production of guns and wheat? c) Assuming that b stands and if all the resources are used for the production of guns, 20 guns can be produced and if all the resources are used for production of wheat, 80 units of wheat can be produced, then what is the opportunity cost of producing one gun?arrow_forwardHow is the first mover advantage related to schelling's paradox of commitment. {note please do not copy paste any article from Google I allready complaint about it}arrow_forwardVan has plans to go to an opera and already has a $100 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Amy, whom Van has wanted to date for a long time, asks him to a party. Van would prefer to go to the party with Amy and forgo the opera, but he doesn't want to waste the $100 he spent on the opera ticket. From the perspective of an economist, if Van decides to go to the party with Amy, what has he just done? 1. Incorrectly allowed a sunk cost to influence his decision 2. Made a choice that was not optimal 3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning