
(a)
The choice between (1) returning the car with full tank (2) returning the car without filling it and pay $5.45/gallon (3) accept a fixed

Answer to Problem 59P
For travelling 150 miles, the choice should be return the car with full gas tank.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
- Car mileage − 28 miles per gallon
- Local price of gasoline − $3.95/gallon
- Travel miles − 150 miles
- Tank size of the car − 16 gallons
We will have to find the best alternative which will have very loss cost bearing. The cost from all three alternatives shall be evaluated.
Calculation
Considering the car gets 28 miles per gallon, to run 150 miles, the gallons of gas required will be:
wherein: NoG − Number of Gallons
Miles − Miles to be covered
Mileage − Number of gallons required to cover one mile
So, to cover 150 miles 5.357 gallons of gas will be spent.
Let us now weigh all the three options:
- Return the car with full tank:
- Return the car without filling the gas tank:
- Accept a fixed price:
In this case, the cost incurred will be as follows, depicted by C − Cost; NoG − Number of gallons and P − local price per gallon:
In this case, the cost incurred will be calculated similar as the previous part but will be calculated at the price that the car company will be charging, that is, $5.45 per gallon
Here we have to pay a fixed price of $50.00 to the rental company.
Conclusion:
Therefore, the best economical option for driving 150 miles is: (a) return the car with a full gastank.
(b)
The choice between (1) returning the car with full tank (2) returning the car without filling it and pay $5.45/gallon (3) accept a fixed price of $50 for gas.

Answer to Problem 59P
For travelling 300 miles, the choice should be return the car with full gas tank.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
- Car mileage − 28 miles per gallon
- Local price of gasoline − $3.95/gallon
- Travel miles − 300 miles
- Tank size of the car − 16 gallons
We will have to find the best alternative which will have very loss cost bearing. The cost from all three alternatives shall be evaluated.
Calculation
Considering the car gets 28 miles per gallon, to run 300 miles, the gallons of gas required will be:
wherein: NoG − Number of Gallons
Miles − Miles to be covered
Mileage − Number of gallons required to cover one mile
So, to cover 300 miles 10.714 gallons of gas will be spent.
Let us now weigh all the three options:
- Return the car with full tank:
- Return the car without filling the gas tank:
- Accept a fixed price:
In this case, the cost incurred will be as follows, depicted by C − Cost; NoG − Number of gallons and P − local price per gallon:
In this case, the cost incurred will be calculated similar as the previous part but will be calculated at the price that the car company will be charging, that is, $5.45 per gallon
Here we have to pay a fixed price of $50.00 to the rental company.
Conclusion:
Therefore, the best economical option for driving 300 miles is: (a) return the car with a full gastank.
(c)
The choice between (1) returning the car with full tank (2) returning the car without filling it and pay $5.45/gallon (3) accept a fixed price of $50 for gas.

Answer to Problem 59P
For travelling 400 miles, the choice should be to pay the fixed price.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
- Car mileage − 28 miles per gallon
- Local price of gasoline − $3.95/gallon
- Travel miles − 400 miles
- Tank size of the car − 16 gallons
We will have to find the best alternative which will have very loss cost bearing. The cost from all three alternatives shall be evaluated.
Calculation
Considering the car gets 28 miles per gallon, to run 400 miles, the gallons of gas required will be:
wherein: NoG − Number of Gallons
Miles − Miles to be covered
Mileage − Number of gallons required to cover one mile
So, to cover 400 miles 14.29 gallons of gas will be spent.
Let us now weigh all the three options:
- Return the car with full tank:
- Return the car without filling the gas tank:
- Accept a fixed price:
In this case, the cost incurred will be as follows, depicted by C − Cost; NoG − Number of gallons and P − local price per gallon:
In this case, the cost incurred will be calculated similar as the previous part but will be calculated at the price that the car company will be charging, that is, $5.45 per gallon
Here we have to pay a fixed price of $50.00 to the rental company.
Conclusion:
Therefore, the best economical option for driving 400 miles is: (c) pay fixed amount $50.
(d)
If the choice changes if there is a time worth $12/hr.

Answer to Problem 59P
The choice does not change if there is a time worth between $12/hr.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
- Car mileage − 28 miles per gallon
- Local price of gasoline − $3.95/gallon
- Travel miles − 150 miles
- Tank size of the car − 16 gallons
- It takes 15minutes to fill the gas and the time is worth $12/hr
We will have to include the cost of time in the first option, while the remaining options do not change.
Calculation
- 150 miles − Return the car with full tank:
In this case, the cost incurred will be as follows, depicted by C − Cost; NoG − Number of gallons and P − local price per gallon:
- Return the car without filling the gas tank: $29.20
- Accept a fixed price: $50
Therefore, the best economical option for driving 150 miles is: (a) return the car with a full gastank.
- 300 miles − Return the car with full tank:
In this case, the cost incurred will be as follows, depicted by C − Cost; NoG − Number of gallons and P − local price per gallon:
- Return the car without filling the gas tank: $58.39
- Accept a fixed price: $50
Therefore, the best economical option for driving 300 miles is: (a) return the car with a full gastank.
- 400 miles − Return the car with full tank:
In this case, the cost incurred will be as follows, depicted by C − Cost; NoG − Number of gallons and P − local price per gallon:
- Return the car without filling the gas tank: $77.88
- Accept a fixed price: $50
Conclusion:
Therefore, the best economical option for driving 400 miles is: (c) pay fixed amount $50.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Engineering Economic Analysis
- agrody calming Inted 001 and me 2. A homeowner is concerned about the various air pollutants (e.g., benzene and methane) released in her house when she cooks with natural gas. She is considering replacing her gas oven and stove with an electric stove comprising an induction cooktop and convection oven. The new appliance costs $900 to purchase and install. Capping the old gas line costs an additional $150 (a one-time fee). The old line must be inspected for leaks each year after capping, at a cost of $35 for each inspection. a. If the homeowner plans to remain in the house for four more years and the discount rate is 4%, what is the minimum present value of the benefits that the homeowner would need to experience for this purchase to be justified based on its private net sub present value? b. While trying to understand how she might express the value of reduced exposure to indoor air pollutants in dollar terms, the homeowner consulted the EPA website and found estimates provided by…arrow_forwardAfter the ban is imposed, Joe’s firm switches to the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups. This increases the cost associated with each cup of coffee it produces. Which cost curve(s) will be impacted by the use of the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups? Why? Which cost curve(s) will not shift, and why not? Please use the table below to answer this question. For the second column (“Impacted? If so, how?”), please use one of the following three choices: No shift; Shifts up (i.e., increases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes up); or Shifts down (i.e., decreases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes down). $ Cost Curve Impacted? If so, how? Explanation of the Shift: Why or Why Not AFC No shift. Fix costs stay the same, regardless of quantity. Fixed cost is calculated as Fixed Cost/Quantity. Since fixed costs remain unchanged, AFC stays the same for each quantity. MC Shifts up. Since the biodegradable cups are more expensive, the…arrow_forwardStyrofoam is non-biodegradable and is not easily recyclable. Many cities and at least one state have enacted laws that ban the use of polystyrene containers. These locales understand that banning these containers will force many businesses to turn to other more expensive forms of packaging and cups, but argue the ban is environmentally important. Shane owns a firm with a conventional production function resulting in U-shaped ATC, AVC, and MC curves. Shane's business sells takeout food and drinks that are currently packaged in styrofoam containers and cups. Graph the short-run AFC0, AVC0, ATC0, and MC0 curves for Shane's firm before the ban on using styrofoam containers.arrow_forward
- PART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forwarda-carrow_forward
- For these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forwardFor environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. cullog iba linevoz ve bubivorearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





