Concept introduction Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

100%

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

What is Philosophy? Based on this week's readings please explain in a few sentences 1) What is philosophy according to Simon Critchley? 2) What are the topics of Austenfeld's "Josef Pieper's contemplative assent to the world" (2000) and Hemingway's "Leisure and democracy: Incompatible ideals” (1991)?

Scene 1 - Introduction to Leisure and Philosophical Thought Which philosopher suits you better? You have completed your work for the day. Now, you are free to do whatever you want. You do not just want to relax, but also want to be active and learn new things in your leisure time. Your attention is then drawn to the guitar lying in the corner. A few minutes later, you start doing some guitar practice instead of just lying down in front of the TV. So, if you do not see leisure just as relaxation, which philosopher suits you better? Aristotle or Epicurus? 1 Aristotle 2 Epicurus

Give two examples from your own life when ignorance has caused you to suffer misfortune. Explain what you learned from these misfortunes, and how you might prevent them in the future.

Answer 2

Question

100%

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

100%

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

100%

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Question

100%

Answer 6

Question

100%

Answer 7

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Answer 8

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Answer 9

Chapter 1, Problem 2R

Summary Introduction

Concept introduction

Describe how the level of analysis you adopt in your research may affect your assumptions about how society works. Specifically address whether Pam Fishman could have conducted her research on gender and power in conversations from a macro perspective or with a survey. Also address whether the research conducted by Christine Williams on gender and power in occupations could have been conducted from a micro perspective with interviews. Discuss how a change in the level of analysis might have affected the conclusions of both studies.

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Suggested response

If an individual has adopted a macro sociological approach, he/she is assuming that large scale social structures have influenced the lives of individuals or groups. Whereas if an individual has adopted a micro sociological approach, then he/she is assuming that our individual and small group day to day interactions with people may impact larger patterns in society.

Fishman could have explored gender and power from a macro sociological perspective using a large-scale survey to look at larger patterns in society. This could have changed the outcome of the study because a larger scale study might have shown a different pattern of responses. Subjects of the survey might have been more comfortable sharing responses in a smaller interview environment. Conversely subjects might have felt more comfortable sharing frank responses in a more anonymous survey environment. Environmental factors might have influenced responses within an interview format whereas they might not have been a factor in a survey. These factors could have changed the patterns that arose as study outcomes.

Williams might not have achieved her desired scale of occupations if she had used micro analysis. She might also have had to limit her analysis to one location or region to achieve her desired results. The outcome of the study could have been significantly different based on size and location of the population studied.

Answer 11

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 12

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 13

Ch. 1 - Prob. 2R Ch. 1 - Prob. 3R

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 1 Solutions