Concept explainers
(a1)
To determine: The relation between MRS and ∆G˚ of the binding reaction.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and interaction with taste bud receptors. Molar relative sweetness (MRS) is the measure of sweetness of the compound relative to sweetness of sucrose.
(a2)
To determine: Whether the more negative value of ∆G˚ will correspond to a higher or lower MRS.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet less. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors on which the compounds bind. Molar relative sweetness (MRS) is the measure of sweetness of the compound relative to sweetness of sucrose.
(b)
To explain: The uses of predicting the sweetness of molecules by computer model instead of a human or animal-based taste assay.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors. The assay that requires less time to generate valuable result would be convenient and desirable.
(c)
To determine: The AH-B groups in each of the given molecules when the length of a typical single bond is about 0.15 nm
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors.
(d)
To determine: The two objections to the statement that molecules containing an AH-B structure will taste sweet are to be determined.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors.
(e)
To determine: The two molecules out of given molecules that can be used to explain the difference in MRS and ∆G˚ and their relation to AH-B model.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors. Molar relative sweetness (MRS) is the measure of sweetness of the compound relative to sweetness of sucrose.
(f)
To determine: The two examples that can be used to argue the AH-B model is unable to explain the observed differences in sweetness.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors. Molar relative sweetness (MRS) is the measure of sweetness of the compound relative to sweetness of sucrose.
(g)
To determine: Whether need to test the model against a different set of molecules from the set it was trained on.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors.
(h)
To determine: The resulting error in MRS values as it has found that the predicted ∆G˚ values for the test set differed from the actual values by, on average, 1.3 kcal/mol.
Introduction: Various compounds taste sweet. Some of them sweet more, while some of them sweet lesser. The sweetness is related to their structures and taste bud receptors. Molar relative sweetness (MRS) is the measure of sweetness of the compound relative to sweetness of sucrose.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 1 Solutions
EBK LEHNINGER PRINCIPLES OF BIOCHEMISTR
- How would I draw this?arrow_forwardCalculate the standard change in Gibbs free energy, AGrxn, for the given reaction at 25.0 °C. Consult the table of thermodynamic properties for standard Gibbs free energy of formation values. NH,Cl(s) →NH; (aq) + C1 (aq) AGrxn -7.67 Correct Answer Determine the concentration of NH+ (aq) if the change in Gibbs free energy, AGrxn, for the reaction is -9.27 kJ/mol. 6.49 [NH+] Incorrect Answer kJ/mol Marrow_forwardWhat are some topics of interest that neurotoxicologists study? For example, toxin-induced seizures, brain death, and such along those lines?arrow_forward
- Could you help me with the explanation of the answer to exercise 15, chapter 1 of Lehinger Question Nombramiento de estereoisómeros con dos carbonos quirales utilizando el sistema RS(R,R)El isómero del metilfenidato (Ritalin) se utiliza para tratar el trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH).(S,S)El isómero es un antidepresivo. Identifique los dos carbonos quirales en la siguiente estructura. ¿Es este el(R,R)o el(S,S)¿isómero? Dibuja el otro isómero. Nombramiento de estereoisómeros con dos carbonos quirales utilizando el sistema RS(R,R)El isómero del metilfenidato (Ritalin) se utiliza para tratar el trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH).(S,S)El isómero es un antidepresivo.arrow_forwardThe reaction A+B → C + D AG°' = -7.3 kcal/mol can be coupled with which of the following unfavorable reactions to drive it forward? A. EFG+HAG° = 5.6 kcal/mol. B. J+KZ+A AG° = 2.3 kcal/mol. C. P+RY+DAG° = 8.2 kcal/mol. D. C + T → V + W AG°' = -5.9 kcal/mol. E. AN→ Q+KAG°' = 4.3 kcal/mol.arrow_forwardWhat would be the toxicological endpoints for neurotoxicity?arrow_forward
- What are "endpoints" in toxicology exactly? Please give an intuitive easy explanationarrow_forwardFura-2 Fluorescence (Arbitrary Unit) 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 [Ca2+]=2970nM, 25°C [Ca2+] 2970nM, 4°C [Ca2+]=0.9nM, 25°C [Ca2+] = 0.9nM, 4°C 0 260 280 300 340 360 380 400 420 440 Wavelength (nm) ← < The figure on the LHS shows the excitation spectra of Fura-2 (Em = 510 nm) in 2 solutions with two different Ca2+ ion concentration as indicated. Except for temperature, the setting for excitation & signal acquisition was identical.< ப a) The unit in Y-axis is arbitrary (unspecified). Why? < < b) Compare & contrast the excitation wavelength of the Isosbestic Point of Fura-2 at 25 °C & 4 °C. Give a possible reason for the discrepancy. < c) The fluorescence intensity at 25 °C & 4 °C are different. Explain why with the concept of electronic configuration. <arrow_forwarddraw in the structure of each amino acid (as L-amino acids) using the Fischer projection style. an example has been included. Draw the structure for glycine, alanine, valine, isoleucine, methionine, proline, phenylalanine, tryptophan, serine, threonine, asparagine, glutamine, lysine, arginine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, histidine, tyrosine, cysteinearrow_forward
- draw in the structure of each amino acid (as L-amino acids) using the Fischer projection style. an example has been includedarrow_forwarddraw in the structure of each amino acid (as L-amino acids) using the Fischer projection style. an example has been includedarrow_forwardDraw out the following peptide H-R-K-E-D at physiological pH (~7.4). Make sure toreference table 3.1 for pKa values.arrow_forward
- BiochemistryBiochemistryISBN:9781319114671Author:Lubert Stryer, Jeremy M. Berg, John L. Tymoczko, Gregory J. Gatto Jr.Publisher:W. H. FreemanLehninger Principles of BiochemistryBiochemistryISBN:9781464126116Author:David L. Nelson, Michael M. CoxPublisher:W. H. FreemanFundamentals of Biochemistry: Life at the Molecul...BiochemistryISBN:9781118918401Author:Donald Voet, Judith G. Voet, Charlotte W. PrattPublisher:WILEY
- BiochemistryBiochemistryISBN:9781305961135Author:Mary K. Campbell, Shawn O. Farrell, Owen M. McDougalPublisher:Cengage LearningBiochemistryBiochemistryISBN:9781305577206Author:Reginald H. Garrett, Charles M. GrishamPublisher:Cengage LearningFundamentals of General, Organic, and Biological ...BiochemistryISBN:9780134015187Author:John E. McMurry, David S. Ballantine, Carl A. Hoeger, Virginia E. PetersonPublisher:PEARSON