You must evaluate the alternatives below to increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. Find the present worth of each alternative at an interest rate of 14% per year, assuming a life of 5 years for both alternatives. Which alternative should be selected and what is its present worth (select the closest value)? Alternative X First Cost $25,000 Maintenance cost, per Year $8,000 Salvage Value $2,500 Option X with a PW--$51.170 Option Y with a PW--$94,620 Option Y with a PW - $55,380 Option X with a PW --$1,170 Y $75,000 $7,000 $8,500

You must evaluate the alternatives below to increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. Find the present worth of each alternative at an interest rate of 14% per year, assuming a life of 5 years for both alternatives. Which alternative should be selected and what is its present worth (select the closest value)? Alternative X First Cost $25,000 Maintenance cost, per Year $8,000 Salvage Value $2,500 Option X with a PW--$51.170 Option Y with a PW--$94,620 Option Y with a PW - $55,380 Option X with a PW --$1,170 Y $75,000 $7,000 $8,500

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Following cash flows for alternatives X and Y at an interest rate of 10% per year. Machine X Machine Y -146,000 -220,000 Initial cost, $ AOC, $/year Annual revenue, $/year Salvage value, $ Life, years -15,000 80,000 10,000 3 -10,000 75,000 25,000 6 In comparing the alternatives on a present worth basis, the PW of Machine X is closest to
Select the best alternative through internal rate of return analysis. Assume that the minimum attractive rate of return is 10% per year. Machine X |Machine YInitial cost $ 400,000.00 $ 500,000.00Annual operating cost $ 15,000.00 |$ 25,000.00 Annual profit $ 20,000.00 |$ 40,000.00Residual value $ 85,000.00 |$ 100,000.00Project life 15 years | none Engineering Economic Analysis
Given the following information about possible investments and a MARR of 15% per year. Alternative A Investment Cost Annual Benefits Useful Life P250,000 P60,000 5 years a.) Which alternative is preferred, based on the LCM method? b.) Which alternative is preferred using a five-year study period. Alternative B P400,000 P40,000 P15 years
Two insulation thickness alternatives have been proposed for a process steam line subject to severe weather conditions. One alternative must be selected. Estimated installation cost and annual savings in heat loss are given below. \table[[\table[[Insulation], [ Thickness]], Installed Cost, \table[[Annual Savings in], [ Heat Loss]], Life of Insulation], [2cm, $20,000, $6,900 per year,4 years], [3cm, $35,000, $9,000 per year, 6 years]] The MARR = 10% per year. The study period is 12 years. Draw the cash flow diagram for each alternative over the entire study period. Two insulation thickness alternatives have been proposed for a process steam line subject to severe weather conditions. One alternative must be selected. Estimated installation cost and annual savings in heat loss are given below. Insulation Thickness 2cm Installed Cost $20,000 $35,000 Annual Savings in Heat Loss $6,900 per year $9,000 per year Life of Insulation 4 years 6 years 3cm = The MARR 10% per year. The study period…
An oil refinery finds that it is necessary to treat the waste liquids from a new process before discharging them into a stream. The treatment will cost $20,000 the first year, but process improvements will allow the costs to decline by $2,000 each year. As an alternative, an outside company will process the wastes for the fixed price of $10,000/year throughout the 7 year period, payable at the beginning of each year. Either way, there is no need to treat the wastes after 7 years. Use the annual worth method to determine how the wastes should be processed. The company's MARR is 14%. Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 14% per year. The AW of the in-house treatment is $ (Round to the nearest dollar.)
Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ Remaining life, years Estimated value in 5 years, $ Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year Current -30,000 15,000 5 7,000 -11,000 The AW of the defender is $- challenger is $- Wilma ((Click to select)) correct. Proposed -40,000 -- 15 10,000 5,000 -3,000 and the AW of the
Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with low friction properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 16% per year, which alternative has the better present worth and what is that value (select the closest value)? Method First Cost AOC, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $170,000 $65,000 $4,000 2 years LS $350,000 $40,000 $29,000 4 years DDM with a PW--$473,000 LS with a PW --$445,900 LS with a PW --$222,055 DDM with a PW--$109,300
Consider the comparison between alternatives A and B. Using present worth method of analysis, and at an interest rate of 10% per year, the values of n that you should use in the uniform series factors to make a correct comparison are: A B First Cost ₱500,000 ₱900,000 Annual Operating Cost ₱100,000 ₱40,000 Salvage Value ₱130,000 ₱150,000 Life 3 years 6 years a. n=3 years for A and n=3 years for B b. n=3 years for A and n=6 years for B c. n=6 years for A and n=6 years for B d. n=6 years for A and n=3 years for B
Dexcon Technologies, Inc., is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (ie.. low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 10% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? Method First Cost M&O Cost, per Year Salvage Value Life DDM $-190,000 $-55,000 $4,000 2 years The present worth for the DDM method is $ The present worth for the LS method is $ The LS method is selected. LS $-430,000 $-25,000 $39,000 4 years
Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct Equipment Current Proposed Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ -30,000 -42,000 15,000 Remaining life, years 5 15 Estimated value in 5 years, $ 7,000 10,000 5,000 -3,000 Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year The AW of the defender is $- Wilma (Click to select) correct. -14,000 and the AW of the challenger is $-
A remotely located air sampling station can be powered by solar cells or by running an electric line to the site and using conventional power. Solar cells will cost $7000 to install and will have a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. Annual costs for inspection, cleaning, etc. are expected to be $1600. A new power line will cost $14000 to install, with power costs expected to be $1300 per year. Since the air sampling project will end in 4 years, the salvage value of the line is considered to be zero. At an interest rate of 8.00% per year, which alternative should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis? (Include a minus sign if necessary.) The future worth of solar cells is $[ and that of electric line is $ (Click to select) :) should be selected on the basis of a future worth analysis.
1. Two methods can be used for producing expansion anchors. Method A costs $70,000 initially and will have a $15,000 salvage value after 3 years. The operating cost with this method will be $30,000 per year. Method B will have a first cost of $135,000, an operating cost of $8,000 per year, and a $40,000 salvage value after its 3-year life. At the MARR of 12% per year, which method should be used on the basis of a present worth analysis?