y be spent on purchasing votes (i.e., any ional defense? How many for the road? Place those values into the appropriate blanks in the table below and then do the same for blanks for Johnson and Lee. Assume there are no additional costs beyond the cost of purchasing votes and that votes must be chased in whole numbers. tructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. Number of Votes Purchased by Each Voter for the Listed Public Projects Public Good Garcia Johnson Lee ational defense 12 pad 17 eather warning system cross all three voters, how many votes are there in favor of national defense? The road? The weather warning system? Votes for national defense: Votes for road: "otes for weather warning system: a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the road, which one wins? Click to select) v a paired-choice vote is taken of the road versus the weather warning system, which one wins?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
a. Assume that voting will be done using a quadratic voting system and that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee are each given $500 that can
only be spent on purchasing votes (i.e., any unspent money has to be returned). How many votes will Garcia purchase to support
national defense? How many for the road? Place those values into the appropriate blanks in the table below and then do the same for
the blanks for Johnson and Lee. Assume there are no additional costs beyond the cost of purchasing votes and that votes must be
purchased in whole numbers.
Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number.
Number of Votes Purchased by Each Voter for the Listed Public Projects
Lee
Public Good
Garcia
Johnson
12
National defense
Road
17
Weather warning system
b. Across all three voters, how many votes are there in favor of national defense? The road? The weather warning system?
Votes for national defense:
Votes for road:
Votes for weather warning system:
c. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the road, which one wins?
(Click to select) v
d. If a paired-choice vote is taken of the road versus the weather warning system, which one wins?
(Click to select)
e. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the weather warning system, which one wins?
(Click to select)
Transcribed Image Text:a. Assume that voting will be done using a quadratic voting system and that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee are each given $500 that can only be spent on purchasing votes (i.e., any unspent money has to be returned). How many votes will Garcia purchase to support national defense? How many for the road? Place those values into the appropriate blanks in the table below and then do the same for the blanks for Johnson and Lee. Assume there are no additional costs beyond the cost of purchasing votes and that votes must be purchased in whole numbers. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. Number of Votes Purchased by Each Voter for the Listed Public Projects Lee Public Good Garcia Johnson 12 National defense Road 17 Weather warning system b. Across all three voters, how many votes are there in favor of national defense? The road? The weather warning system? Votes for national defense: Votes for road: Votes for weather warning system: c. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the road, which one wins? (Click to select) v d. If a paired-choice vote is taken of the road versus the weather warning system, which one wins? (Click to select) e. If a paired-choice vote is taken of national defense versus the weather warning system, which one wins? (Click to select)
Let's see whether quadratic voting can avoid the paradox of voting that arose in Table 5.3 when using 1p1v in a series of paired-choice
majority votes. To reexamine this situation using quadratic voting, the table below presents the maximum willingness to pay of Garcia,
Johnson, and Lee for each of the three public goods. Notice that each person's numbers for willingness to pay match her or his
ordering of preferences (1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice) presented in Table 5.3. Thus, Garcia is willing to spend more on her first
choice of national defense ($400) than on her second choice of a road ($100) or her third choice of a weather warning system ($0).
TABLE 5.3 Paradox of Voting
Preferences
Public Good
Garcia
Johnson
Lee
National defense
1st choice
3d cholce
2d cholce
Road
2d cholce
1st choice
3d cholce
Weather warning system
3d choice
2d choice
1st choice
Election
Voting Outcomes: Winner
1. National defense vs. road
National defense (preferred by Garcia and Lee)
2. Road vs. weather warning system
Road (preferred by Garcia and Johnson)
3. National defense vs. weather warning system Weather warning system (preferred by Johnson and Lee)
Individual Voter Willingness to Pay for the Listed Public Projects
Johnson
$ 50
Public Good
Garcia
Lee
National defense
$ 400
$ 150
Road
100
300
100
Weather warning system
250
150
a. Assume that voting will be done using a quadratic voting system and that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee are each given $500 that can
only be spent on purchasing votes (i.e., any unspent money has to be returned). How many votes will Garcia purchase to support
national defense? How many for the road? Place those values into the appropriate blanks in the table below and then do the same for
the blanks for Johnson and Lee. Assume there are no additional costs beyond the cost of purchasing votes and that votes must be
purchased in whole numbers.
Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number.
Transcribed Image Text:Let's see whether quadratic voting can avoid the paradox of voting that arose in Table 5.3 when using 1p1v in a series of paired-choice majority votes. To reexamine this situation using quadratic voting, the table below presents the maximum willingness to pay of Garcia, Johnson, and Lee for each of the three public goods. Notice that each person's numbers for willingness to pay match her or his ordering of preferences (1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice) presented in Table 5.3. Thus, Garcia is willing to spend more on her first choice of national defense ($400) than on her second choice of a road ($100) or her third choice of a weather warning system ($0). TABLE 5.3 Paradox of Voting Preferences Public Good Garcia Johnson Lee National defense 1st choice 3d cholce 2d cholce Road 2d cholce 1st choice 3d cholce Weather warning system 3d choice 2d choice 1st choice Election Voting Outcomes: Winner 1. National defense vs. road National defense (preferred by Garcia and Lee) 2. Road vs. weather warning system Road (preferred by Garcia and Johnson) 3. National defense vs. weather warning system Weather warning system (preferred by Johnson and Lee) Individual Voter Willingness to Pay for the Listed Public Projects Johnson $ 50 Public Good Garcia Lee National defense $ 400 $ 150 Road 100 300 100 Weather warning system 250 150 a. Assume that voting will be done using a quadratic voting system and that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee are each given $500 that can only be spent on purchasing votes (i.e., any unspent money has to be returned). How many votes will Garcia purchase to support national defense? How many for the road? Place those values into the appropriate blanks in the table below and then do the same for the blanks for Johnson and Lee. Assume there are no additional costs beyond the cost of purchasing votes and that votes must be purchased in whole numbers. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education