Why? What makes possession narratives so difficult for historians to deconstruct and interpret? Why does Levack contend nevertheless that we cannot dismiss reports and narratives of possession as simply fictional. How should we read them, and what can we learn from them? Show examples from the text.
Why? What makes possession narratives so difficult for historians to deconstruct and interpret? Why does Levack contend nevertheless that we cannot dismiss reports and narratives of possession as simply fictional. How should we read them, and what can we learn from them? Show examples from the text.
Related questions
Question
On page 3 of The Devil Within, Levack states that "Demonic possession is a methodological land mine for historians." Why? What makes possession narratives so difficult for historians to deconstruct and interpret? Why does Levack contend nevertheless that we cannot dismiss reports and narratives of possession as simply fictional. How should we read them, and what can we learn from them?
Show examples from the text.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
