While the formulation of unique factorization in a general integral domain is a bit more complicated than the one we used for Z, it is straightforward to show that Z satisfies the new formulation. However, the quadratic integer ring Z[√5] does not. 5. The goal of this problem is to prove that the equalities 6 = 2.3 = (1+√−5)(1 − √−5) constitute a genuine failure of unique factorization in Z[√-5]. (a) Prove that neither 2 nor 3 is the norm of an element in Z[√-5]. (b) Use (a) to prove that 2, 3, and 1 ± √-5 are prime in Z[√-5]. (Hint: Use unique factorization in Z applied to norms; part (a) will help.) (c) Verify that neither 2 nor 3 is a unit (in Z[√5]) multiplied by 1± √-5. (Hint: Problem 4 describes the unit group of Z[√-5].)
While the formulation of unique factorization in a general integral domain is a bit more complicated than the one we used for Z, it is straightforward to show that Z satisfies the new formulation. However, the quadratic integer ring Z[√5] does not. 5. The goal of this problem is to prove that the equalities 6 = 2.3 = (1+√−5)(1 − √−5) constitute a genuine failure of unique factorization in Z[√-5]. (a) Prove that neither 2 nor 3 is the norm of an element in Z[√-5]. (b) Use (a) to prove that 2, 3, and 1 ± √-5 are prime in Z[√-5]. (Hint: Use unique factorization in Z applied to norms; part (a) will help.) (c) Verify that neither 2 nor 3 is a unit (in Z[√5]) multiplied by 1± √-5. (Hint: Problem 4 describes the unit group of Z[√-5].)
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
![While the formulation of unique factorization in a general integral domain is a bit more
complicated than the one we used for Z, it is straightforward to show that Z satisfies the
new formulation. However, the quadratic integer ring Z[√5] does not.
5. The goal of this problem is to prove that the equalities
6=2.3=(1+√−5)(1
constitute a genuine failure of unique factorization in Z[√-5].
(a) Prove that neither 2 nor 3 is the norm of an element in Z[√-5].
(b) Use (a) to prove that 2, 3, and 1 ± √-5 are prime in Z[√-5]. (Hint: Use unique
factorization in Z applied to norms; part (a) will help.)
(c) Verify that neither 2 nor 3 is a unit (in Z[√-5]) multiplied by 1± √-5. (Hint:
Problem 4 describes the unit group of Z[√-5].)](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Febb913e1-4986-4d74-b6ce-ad576ddf43d3%2F9da127a2-93c2-4023-b1d2-e339b674b617%2Fkegn9qr_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:While the formulation of unique factorization in a general integral domain is a bit more
complicated than the one we used for Z, it is straightforward to show that Z satisfies the
new formulation. However, the quadratic integer ring Z[√5] does not.
5. The goal of this problem is to prove that the equalities
6=2.3=(1+√−5)(1
constitute a genuine failure of unique factorization in Z[√-5].
(a) Prove that neither 2 nor 3 is the norm of an element in Z[√-5].
(b) Use (a) to prove that 2, 3, and 1 ± √-5 are prime in Z[√-5]. (Hint: Use unique
factorization in Z applied to norms; part (a) will help.)
(c) Verify that neither 2 nor 3 is a unit (in Z[√-5]) multiplied by 1± √-5. (Hint:
Problem 4 describes the unit group of Z[√-5].)
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Advanced Engineering Mathematics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780470458365/9780470458365_smallCoverImage.gif)
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
![Numerical Methods for Engineers](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780073397924/9780073397924_smallCoverImage.gif)
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118141809/9781118141809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
![Advanced Engineering Mathematics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780470458365/9780470458365_smallCoverImage.gif)
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
![Numerical Methods for Engineers](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780073397924/9780073397924_smallCoverImage.gif)
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118141809/9781118141809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
![Mathematics For Machine Technology](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337798310/9781337798310_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
![Basic Technical Mathematics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134437705/9780134437705_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Topology](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134689517/9780134689517_smallCoverImage.gif)