Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%? TSA Sims 4 Male Hairsty..Course HeroC Unit Activity Answe...QuillBot AlCourse Activity: Treatments and Significance12 of 19E Save & EDetermine the probability of the treatment group's mean being greater than the control group's mean by 8 points ormore. Then complete the statements.- theThe significance level is set at 5%, and the probability of the result is 3.6significance level. The result is statistically significant* %. which is less thanPart BQuestionWhich statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%?o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizerdoes increase the growth rate.O The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer doesnot increase the growth rate.* The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer doesincrease the growth rate.o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that this result could be due to random chance.Question 2According to a research study, people can better manage their time when they wear watches than when they use mobilephones or other gadgets to keep track of time.To test the study's results, researchers randomized 300 college students into a treatment group and a control group. Thetreatment group was asked to wear a watch every day, and the control group was asked to avoid wearing a watch for 50 days.Researchers noted the number of occasions when students from both groups arrived later than their scheduled time.The results of the experiment showed that the mean score of the treatment group was exactly 15 points less than the meanscore of the control group. To test whether the results could be explained by random chance, the researchers created thefollowing table, which summarizes the results of 1,000 randomizations of the data with differences of means rounded to thenearest 5 points.Considen the sgnificance level to be set at 5%, so results lower than 5% can be considered statistically significant.Treahmet nin an nntni firun iounFraanu Course Activity: Treatments and Significance12 of 19E Save & ExTask 2* PrintApplying a Level of SignificanceIn this task, you'll study the data from two experiments. For each data set, you will determine whether the difference of meansbetween the treatment group and the control group is statistically significant and interpret the result in the context of thesituation.Question 1Researchers want to find a way to increase the growth rate of corn so it can be harvested more often. To test the effectivenessof a new type of spray fertilizer, plants grown from 200 corn seeds were divided equally into two groups: a treatment groupand a control group. The treatment group was frequently sprayed with the new type of fertilizer. The growth in centimeters ofeach corn plant was noted before and after the treatmentThe results showed that the mean change in the growth rate by the treatment group is 8 points more than that of the controlgroup. To test whether the results could be explained by random chance, researchers created a table that summarizes theresults of 1,000 re-randomizations of the data with differences of means rounded to the nearest 2 points.Consider the significance level to be set at 5%, so results less than 5% can be considered statistically significant.Treatment Group Mean - Control Group MeanFrequency-12-10102858-4125-218420118611457261012Part A2 QuestionDetermine the probability of the treatment group's mean being greater than the control group's mean by 8 points ormore. Then complete the statements.

Treatment mean with frequency data is given To say the growth rate with respect to the Distribution…

Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%? o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does not increase the growth rate. * The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is not statistically significant, which implies that this result could be due to random chance.

Which statement is true about the result considering a significance level of 5%? o The result is not statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does not increase the growth rate. * The result is statistically significant, which implies that spraying the corn plants with the new type of fertilizer does increase the growth rate. O The result is not statistically significant, which implies that this result could be due to random chance.

Algebra and Trigonometry (6th Edition)

6th Edition

ISBN:9780134463216

Author:Robert F. Blitzer

Publisher:Robert F. Blitzer

ChapterP: Prerequisites: Fundamental Concepts Of Algebra

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1MCCP: In Exercises 1-25, simplify the given expression or perform the indicated operation (and simplify,...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is the area of proportion between the mean and a z-score of -2.88? What is the area of proportion beyond a score score of .34?
What is the effect of increasing the confidence level on the margin of error?
What is the sampling distribution of a statistic? Why is it important?
Describe about the Level of Significance or p -Value?
The question is the second picture
Are freshmen psychology majors more likely to change their major before they graduate compared to freshmen business majors? 344 of the 618 freshmen psychology majors from a recent study changed their major before they graduated and 350 of the 715 freshmen business majors changed their major before they graduated. What can be concluded at the = 0.05 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean z-test for a population proportion t-test for the difference between two independent population means z-test for the difference between two population proportions t-test for the difference between two dependent population means The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Select an answer μ1 p1 Select an answer > ≠ < = Select an answer μ2 p2 (please enter a decimal) Select an answer p1 μ1 Select an answer > ≠ = < Select an answer μ2 p2 (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic ? t z = (please show your…
Which of the following is not a statistic used in comparing 2 binomial proportions? Risk Difference Relative Risk Odds Ratio Welch-Satterthwaite degrees of freedom
14) Find the score that separates the top 80% from the bottom 20% if the Mean is 100 and the Standard deviation is 26
A table summarizes the success and failures when subjects used different methods (yoga, acupuncture, and chiropractor) to relieve back pain. If we test the claim at a 5% level of significance that success is independent of the method used, technology provides a P-value of 0.0355. What does the P-value tell us about the claim?
What conclusion may be drawn witha5% significance?
The mayoral challenger claims that less than 30% of residents over the age of 25 have bachelor’s degrees in our city. To test this claim, you survey 80 adults over the age of 25 and find only 18 possess bachelor’s degrees. At the 5% level of significance, is there enough evidence to SUPPORT the challenger’s claim? Null: Ho alternative:Ha (use u for mean and p for proportion)
It the 1980s, it was generally believed that congenital abnormalities affected about 7% of a large nation's children. Some people believe that the increase in the number of chemicals in the environment has led to an increase in the incidence of abnormalities. A recent study examined 436 randomly selected children and found that 39 of them showed signs of an abnormality. Is this strong evidence that the risk has increased? (We consider a P-value of around 5% to represent reasonable evidence.) Complete parts a through f. Assume the independence assumption is met. a) Write appropriate hypotheses. Let p be the proportion of children with genetic abnormalities. Choose the correct answer below. B. Ho: p=0.07 vs. HA: p > 0.07 D. Ho: p=0.0894 vs. HA: p 0.0894 OC. Ho: p=0.0894 vs. HA: P# 0.0894 OE. Ho: p=0.07 vs. HA: P# 0.07 P-value =