Answered: - Which law can be used to determine…

- Which law can be used to determine that statement (3) is a valid conclusion to statements (1) and (2)? (1) If an angle is acute, then it cannot be obtuse. (2) ZA is acute.

Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e

7th Edition

ISBN:9781337614085

Author:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.

Publisher:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.

ChapterP: Preliminary Concepts

SectionP.CT: Test

Problem 1CT

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: P, Q and R are logical statements. Decisions about the expression (P → (Q ∨ R)) ↔ (¬P ∨ Q ∨ R) is a…

Q: Question 18 (1 point) If statement A is true and statements B and C are both false, what is the…

A: Generating the truth table:

Q: Differentiate between premise, conclusion and inference, give an example of each.

A: Premise, conclusion and inference.

Q: Prove that these arguments are valid through natural deduction. 1. ~a --> ~b 2. a --> c 3. c --> d…

A: We use the rules of inference to prove the validity of the given argument.

Q: Given the following proposition: - (~ (X v ~ Y) = (~ X ɔ ~A) v ~ (B• ~ A)) %3B Given that A and B…

A: Since you have posted multiple questions and we can answer one question. So answered question number…

Q: Solve using Natural Deduction Logic (w/rules would be appreciated) 1) ¬(A ∧ B) ⊢ ¬A ∨ ¬B (2) A →…

A: We have prove by natural deduction logic

Q: Given the proposition: I will be lonely if and only if I am lazy and does not exercise. What can you…

A: Logic

Q: Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. a) If Fido is our dog's name,…

A: let p: Fido is our dog's name q: Rex is our dog's name then, the symbolic form of the given…

Q: 1) Yes/No Is the following logical expression a proposition: ∀z ∃y Q(x, y, z)?

Q: What rule of inference has two variants where the first points out that either P and Q are both true…

Q: Question 5) Prove that the following expression whether tautology or not using logical expressions?…

Q: All the employees at the Acmesoft company are either programmer or salespeople.The programmers…

A: There are two employees. They can be both programmers, both sales person, one programmer and one…

Q: 4. Determine m E Z with 0 <m <3 such that m = 12103 mod 4.

A: The congruence equation : m≡12103 mod 4, m∈ℤ with 0≤m≤3.

Q: Prove the following statements (Premises) using the natural deduction laws: Premises Conclusion D>…

A: Given to prove: D→A∧BB→L∧M D M Proof: I. If D, then A∧B that is both A and B. II.…

Q: s it the case tha your answer.

A: a) φ→ψ Here, ω=tatology

Q: The question is related to logic and moral reasoning. Prove that these arguments are valid through…

A: 1. x --> y (premise)2. y --> z (premise)3. ~z (assumption)4. [3, 2] y (modus ponens)5. [4, 1]…

Q: For each pair of statements, choose the one that is true. Ofe (e,f) (a) ohe le.f) o (6, 7, 8) E {1,…

A: All the elements of let say set A always belong to set A. Any set is called the subset of let say…

Q: Verify the following proposition is tautology or contradiction: [(pq)^(q +> r)]¬(p+>r)

A: The opposite of tautology is contradiction. A contradictory statement is always false. If any truth…

Q: Q.6) a. For the given statement write as a conditional statement, then write Converse, the inverse…

Q: If A and B Represent logical verses (For example, A Will be "all humans are mortals and Socrates is…

Q: -Show that ¬(p → q) and p^ ¬q are logically equivalent. (Hint: use truth ed Show that the premises…

Q: Ogies, Y IS a tautology? Justify your answer. (b) If (y = ) is a contradiction, must either of y, y…

Q: Proposition 1E Given the following proposition: ~((Y = - A) 5 (~ X v Y) • (~ B v ~ X)) Given that A…

Q: How many lines does the most natural proof of the following proposition contain: ((A - B) A (A - C))…

Q: A positive statement A cannot be evaluated using the scientific method. B) is a declaration of…

A: In hypothesis testing, researcher makes statement to test it on some level of significance

Q: 1. " (X." Y) v (B · C)

A: The statement is given,

Q: How many proofs does the most natural proof for this proposition contain given the following…

Q: Proposition 1G Given the following proposition: ((A = X) v (Y ɔ - B) ɔ ~(X v B)• (A • Y)) Given that…

A: Q2 asked and answered.

Q: If x and y are two propositions, then disjunction of x and y is a proposition which is- • True when…

Q: Question 1) B(x) means that " x has a car", T(x,y) means that "x and y talked on the phone", where…

A: c) ∃x∀yx=y∨Bx∧¬Tx, y Translation in English there exist x such that for any y either x=y or x has a…

Q: Question 1: Let p, q and r denote the propositions 'My computer has 512 MB of memory', 'My computer…

A: According to our guidelines I can answer only one question .

Q: 2\ Which of the following statements is tautology and which one is contradiction: 1)p +-p 2)p → p

Q: Use De Morgan's laws to determine which one of the below expressions is equivalent to the following…

A: We have to find correct option by finding equivalent expression using given information. Concept…

Q: (-pAq) v (pA-q) is a tautology

A: Tautology means always True.

Q: X implies (Y and Z) is logically equivalent to (X implies Y) or (X implies Z) A) True B) False

A: Given statement is X implies (Y and Z) is logically equivalent to (X implies Y) or (X implies Z)

Question

Which law can be used to determine that statement (3) us a valid conclusion to statements (1) and (2)?

hen he finishes one loop arour
34. Which law can be used to determine that statement (3) is a valid
conclusion to statements (1) and (2)?
(1) If an angle is acute, then it cannot be obtuse.
(2) ZA is acute.
(3) ZA cannot be obtuse
A. Law of Detachment
B. Law of Syllogism
C. Statement (3) does not follow.
D. Law of Converse
35. True or false: Two statements joined with the word 'or' is called a
conjunction.

Expert Solution

Step 1

Law of detachment

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Similar questions

Question 2.Which laws of the algebra of propositions (not truth table) I should use to proof the following and how:(a∧b) ∨ ~c <-> ~c ∨ b I know and I can see that proposition is correct / is logically equivalent.But my question is how can I see it/ justify it with Laws of the Algebra of propositions?
The compound proposition "If an integer is even, then its' square is even" is logically equivalent to A If the square of a number is even, then the number is even. B An integer is even whenever its' square is even. C) If an integer is odd, then its' square is odd. If the square of a number is odd, then the number is odd.
Second question pls
If x > 6, then y 7, then y 7, then y < 15. A. Follows logically B. Does not follow logically
please i want to answer you as soon as possible within 20min
If~(p V g) is true, what must be the truth values of the component statements? 1: h hes
3.) (P→Q)=CQ→°P) Build the truth table. P -P P →Q According to the truth table you built, are these statements logically equivalent? Why or why not?
Argument 5: Premise: Premise: Conclusion: Argument Form? Argument 6: Premise: (C 5 J) • (~P = W) Premise: Cv mP Conclusion: ~) v W Argument Form? Argument 7: Premise: Premise: Conclusion: Argument Form? Argument 8: Premise: Premise: Conclusion: Arqument Form?