When Paul Samuelson switched from physics to economics, Robert Solow is said to have remarked that the average IQ in both disciplines went up. A bystander responded that Solow's claim must be wrong because it implies that the average IQ for academia as a whole (which is a weighted average of the average IQ levels for each discipline) must also have gone up as a result of the switch, which is clearly impossible. Was the bystander right? A) Yes. If the average in both disciplines goes up then the population average must also rise. B) No. There is not enough information about the average IQ for the population. C) Yes. The weights may change so that the population average also increases. D) No. If those in physics had IQs above average and those in economics has IQs below average, then the population average need not have changed.

When Paul Samuelson switched from physics to economics, Robert Solow is said to have remarked that the average IQ in both disciplines went up. A bystander responded that Solow's claim must be wrong because it implies that the average IQ for academia as a whole (which is a weighted average of the average IQ levels for each discipline) must also have gone up as a result of the switch, which is clearly impossible. Was the bystander right? A) Yes. If the average in both disciplines goes up then the population average must also rise. B) No. There is not enough information about the average IQ for the population. C) Yes. The weights may change so that the population average also increases. D) No. If those in physics had IQs above average and those in economics has IQs below average, then the population average need not have changed.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is the development of economic theory random, or are there causal forces at work? explian
Indicate whether each of the following statement applies to microeconomics or macroeconomics: Last week Wells Fargo Bank lowered its interest rate on business loans by one-half of 1 percentage point.
Yes, I do believe people who disagree in regard to normative ethical theory can still reach an agreement on practical ethical questions within the business world. I have had many bosses and many co-workers whom I have not necessarily agreed with when it comes to morals and values outside of work, however, in the workplace most people can agree on practical ethical questions for example sexual harassment, stealing, cheating, client/customer privacy, unethical leadership, etc. I have found that in the workplace you can become friends with people who hold completely different normative ethics than you but still agree on common goals for the business, in fact I think it is a great thing that people who may disagree and have different opinions on ethics come together in the workplace because it makes for different ways of thinking and diversity within the business. please help reply to disussion post
need help with macroeconomic question 23. A Malthusian and a modern economist walk into a bar and converse as follows: MALTHUSIAN: I bet you $1,000 that I can make the average patron in this bar wealthier with a simple trick.MODERN ECONOMIST: I agree to your bet, and bet you $2,000 that I can do a better job.Thus, the Malthusian proceeds to murder half of the patrons, cleanly disposing of their bodies. The modern economist, on the other hand, replaces the bartender with a robot. How can we explain this ridiculous situation?(A) The Malthusian believes that killing people raises per-capita wealth, while the economist believes that technological improvements raise per-capita wealth.(B) The Malthusian believes that the agricultural commodities used in beer are scarce, and should be preserved; the modern economist believes that technological im- provements raise per-capita wealth.(C) There is no underlying logic to their actions.(D) The Malthusian and modern economists are both soyjacks…
Discuss the claim that the main developments in microeconomic theory in the 1920s and 1930s involved moving on from the theories developed by Alfred Marshall.
Suppose you and your friend go out for dinner. Your friend orders a cheeseburger and fries. When your food first arrives, you ask your friend if you can have one of his fries. He looks at you like you are crazy and says, "No!" Then a few minutes later, after you both have started eating, you ask again, and your friend reluctantly says, "Sure. Go ahead." An economist's explanation for your friend's change of heart is most likely to be that: Your friend's total utility declines as he eats more fries, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few. Your friend's marginal utility from eating additional fries declines as he eats more of them, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few. Your friend's total utility increases as he eats more fries, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few. Your friend's marginal utility from eating additional fries increases as he eats more of them, so he's more likely to share with you…
What are the principle characteristics of positive versus normative economic analysis
Which major event led to the rise of sociology as a discipline? The Crusades Industrial Revolution American Civil War Fall of the Soviet Union
What are the specific functions of Econometrics in Economics or in Agricultural Economics?
What is the contributions of Paul Samuelson to the history of economic thought?
Discuss briefly Schumpeterian theory of economics development.
According to Richard Thaler, what two things give economics its reputation as the most powerful social science?