What were some of the technological differences between the Spanish and the Aztecs? Aside from the great tactical advantages of the Spanish army with their cavalry and military-type formations that differed from the Aztec style of fighting, there were other differences. For example, the Spanish armies fought with steel swords, pikes, and weapons that used gunpowder such as muskets and canons, whereas the Aztec forces used spears and weapons made of softer metals like bronze and copper. How did warfare tactics benefit the Spanish and not the Aztecs? Besides their technological advantages, the Spanish victory over the Aztec forces was evident in the Spanish’s war tactics. While both forces had organized formations that would give each of them some advantage, it was the superior tactics of the Spanish army that were better well-trained and experienced in modern warfare. The Spanish had infantry that led the charge and met the Aztec forces head-on, allowing them to stand their ground. Then the Aztec forces dealt with the Spanish cavalry who would break up the formations of the Aztec forces which drove them into retreat. Was the combat just between the Aztecs and the Spanish? Who else was involved? Combat was chiefly between the Spanish and the Aztecs; the Spanish victory was also due to the addition of an indigenous group of people called Tlaxcalans. Tlaxcalans were initially hostile towards the Spanish, but eventually, peace was made between the two after a series of battles. It should be noted that Tlaxcalans were also in opposition to the Aztecs. Eventually, the Tlaxcalans joined forces with the Spanish to fight against the Aztecs. The Tlaxcalan army wasn’t well trained and utilized as the main force that accounted for the majority of the casualties lost during battle; essentially the Spanish used the Tlaxcalan forces as “cannon fodder”. Explain if you agree why in own words
What were some of the technological differences between the Spanish and the Aztecs? Aside from the great tactical advantages of the Spanish army with their cavalry and military-type formations that differed from the Aztec style of fighting, there were other differences. For example, the Spanish armies fought with steel swords, pikes, and weapons that used gunpowder such as muskets and canons, whereas the Aztec forces used spears and weapons made of softer metals like bronze and copper. How did warfare tactics benefit the Spanish and not the Aztecs? Besides their technological advantages, the Spanish victory over the Aztec forces was evident in the Spanish’s war tactics. While both forces had organized formations that would give each of them some advantage, it was the superior tactics of the Spanish army that were better well-trained and experienced in modern warfare. The Spanish had infantry that led the charge and met the Aztec forces head-on, allowing them to stand their ground. Then the Aztec forces dealt with the Spanish cavalry who would break up the formations of the Aztec forces which drove them into retreat. Was the combat just between the Aztecs and the Spanish? Who else was involved? Combat was chiefly between the Spanish and the Aztecs; the Spanish victory was also due to the addition of an indigenous group of people called Tlaxcalans. Tlaxcalans were initially hostile towards the Spanish, but eventually, peace was made between the two after a series of battles. It should be noted that Tlaxcalans were also in opposition to the Aztecs. Eventually, the Tlaxcalans joined forces with the Spanish to fight against the Aztecs. The Tlaxcalan army wasn’t well trained and utilized as the main force that accounted for the majority of the casualties lost during battle; essentially the Spanish used the Tlaxcalan forces as “cannon fodder”. Explain if you agree why in own words
Related questions
Question
What were some of the technological differences between the Spanish and the Aztecs?
Aside from the great tactical advantages of the Spanish army with their cavalry and military-type formations that differed from the Aztec style of fighting, there were other differences. For example, the Spanish armies fought with steel swords, pikes, and weapons that used gunpowder such as muskets and canons, whereas the Aztec forces used spears and weapons made of softer metals like bronze and copper.
How did warfare tactics benefit the Spanish and not the Aztecs?
Besides their technological advantages, the Spanish victory over the Aztec forces was evident in the Spanish’s war tactics. While both forces had organized formations that would give each of them some advantage, it was the superior tactics of the Spanish army that were better well-trained and experienced in modern warfare. The Spanish had infantry that led the charge and met the Aztec forces head-on, allowing them to stand their ground. Then the Aztec forces dealt with the Spanish cavalry who would break up the formations of the Aztec forces which drove them into retreat.
Was the combat just between the Aztecs and the Spanish? Who else was involved?
Combat was chiefly between the Spanish and the Aztecs; the Spanish victory was also due to the addition of an indigenous group of people called Tlaxcalans. Tlaxcalans were initially hostile towards the Spanish, but eventually, peace was made between the two after a series of battles. It should be noted that Tlaxcalans were also in opposition to the Aztecs. Eventually, the Tlaxcalans joined forces with the Spanish to fight against the Aztecs. The Tlaxcalan army wasn’t well trained and utilized as the main force that accounted for the majority of the casualties lost during battle; essentially the Spanish used the Tlaxcalan forces as “cannon fodder”.
Explain if you agree why in own words
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
