Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
What is this source discussing in regards to the Ottomans’ change and continuity?

What is this source discussing in regards to the Ottomans’ change and continuity?

icon
Related questions
Question
100%
What is this source discussing in regards to the Ottomans’ change and continuity?
**Source 1:** Letters by Ogier Gislein de Busbecq, an ambassador from the Holy Roman Empire to the Ottomans. De Busbecq was sent by Archduke Ferdinand I in 1554 to create a compromise with the Ottomans over land lost in the Battle of Mohács [modified]. Against us stands Suleiman (Ottoman Sultan); heroic Ferdinand reflects what an unequal contest it would be, if our 25,000 or 30,000 infantry with the addition of a small body of cavalry should be pitted against 200,000 cavalry supported by veteran infantry. The result to be expected is... slaughtered Christians. The Sultan, when he sets out on a campaign, takes as many as 40,000 camels with him, and almost as many baggage-mules. I mentioned that baggage animals are employed on campaign to carry the arms and tents, which mainly belong to the Janissaries. You will see that it is the patience, self-denial and thrift of the Turkish soldier that enable him to face the most trying circumstances and come safely out of the dangers that surround him. What a contrast to our men! Christian soldiers on a campaign refuse to put up with their ordinary food, and call for such dainty dishes! It makes me shudder to think of what the result of a struggle between such different systems must be. No nation in the world has shown greater readiness than the Turks to avail themselves of the useful inventions of foreigners, as is proved by their employment of cannons and mortars, and many other things invented by Christians. The Turks [however] are much afraid of [rifles] and pistols, such are used on horseback. The same, I hear, is the case with the Persians.
Transcribed Image Text:**Source 1:** Letters by Ogier Gislein de Busbecq, an ambassador from the Holy Roman Empire to the Ottomans. De Busbecq was sent by Archduke Ferdinand I in 1554 to create a compromise with the Ottomans over land lost in the Battle of Mohács [modified]. Against us stands Suleiman (Ottoman Sultan); heroic Ferdinand reflects what an unequal contest it would be, if our 25,000 or 30,000 infantry with the addition of a small body of cavalry should be pitted against 200,000 cavalry supported by veteran infantry. The result to be expected is... slaughtered Christians. The Sultan, when he sets out on a campaign, takes as many as 40,000 camels with him, and almost as many baggage-mules. I mentioned that baggage animals are employed on campaign to carry the arms and tents, which mainly belong to the Janissaries. You will see that it is the patience, self-denial and thrift of the Turkish soldier that enable him to face the most trying circumstances and come safely out of the dangers that surround him. What a contrast to our men! Christian soldiers on a campaign refuse to put up with their ordinary food, and call for such dainty dishes! It makes me shudder to think of what the result of a struggle between such different systems must be. No nation in the world has shown greater readiness than the Turks to avail themselves of the useful inventions of foreigners, as is proved by their employment of cannons and mortars, and many other things invented by Christians. The Turks [however] are much afraid of [rifles] and pistols, such are used on horseback. The same, I hear, is the case with the Persians.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer