What is the state of police discretion today? Discuss the discretion police officers have. Some say you can substitute the words Power and/or Authority for discretion, they literally mean the same in police practice. What do you think? What are the pros and cons of discretion? Some say that discretion is used to justify discrimination. They would argue that discretion is nothing more than justification for discriminatory acts like those leading into the professional era of policing; these folks would like to limit

Social Psychology (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ1
icon
Related questions
Question
What is the state of police discretion today? Discuss the
discretion police officers have. Some say you can substitute the
words Power and/or Authority for discretion, they literally mean
the same in police practice. What do you think? What are the pros
and cons of discretion? Some say that discretion is used to justify
discrimination. They would argue that discretion is nothing more
than justification for discriminatory acts like those leading into
the professional era of policing; these folks would like to limit
police discretion. There is precedent for limiting police discretion:
In California law there is no police discretion allowed in domestic
violence calls. If the responding officer sees signs of trauma, a
bloody lip, a black eye, bruise, etc. California law say that the
responding officer shall arrest the other party, in legal parlance
shall means must. If both parties are bruised, the officer must
arrest both parties; the officers discretion has been taken away in
these situations. The law was changed to reflect the rights of
battered women do to their intense lobbying.
On the other hand, think about this. If we were to limit police
discretion, every time an officer pulled you over for an alleged
traffic violation, she would be forced to write a ticket. No
discretion means no warning. We have taken away the officers
ability to apply mercy, because we were afraid she would abuse
her authority, so now everything, whether a minor infraction, or
someone's first time misdemeanor violation, has to be dealt with
as a strict violation of the law, zero tolerance policing in other
words; is this what we want? Should discretion be removed, why
or why not? And, if we keep police discretion how do we defend
against biased officers? Consider your answer carefully.
Transcribed Image Text:What is the state of police discretion today? Discuss the discretion police officers have. Some say you can substitute the words Power and/or Authority for discretion, they literally mean the same in police practice. What do you think? What are the pros and cons of discretion? Some say that discretion is used to justify discrimination. They would argue that discretion is nothing more than justification for discriminatory acts like those leading into the professional era of policing; these folks would like to limit police discretion. There is precedent for limiting police discretion: In California law there is no police discretion allowed in domestic violence calls. If the responding officer sees signs of trauma, a bloody lip, a black eye, bruise, etc. California law say that the responding officer shall arrest the other party, in legal parlance shall means must. If both parties are bruised, the officer must arrest both parties; the officers discretion has been taken away in these situations. The law was changed to reflect the rights of battered women do to their intense lobbying. On the other hand, think about this. If we were to limit police discretion, every time an officer pulled you over for an alleged traffic violation, she would be forced to write a ticket. No discretion means no warning. We have taken away the officers ability to apply mercy, because we were afraid she would abuse her authority, so now everything, whether a minor infraction, or someone's first time misdemeanor violation, has to be dealt with as a strict violation of the law, zero tolerance policing in other words; is this what we want? Should discretion be removed, why or why not? And, if we keep police discretion how do we defend against biased officers? Consider your answer carefully.
Expert Solution
Introduction

Policing is a powerful tool for social control in a community. Sociologists view the police as distinct representatives of social control. Sociologists also examine the connection between conflicts and policing practices. Therefore, the police are crucial to society as social control agents. Let's continue to talk about this.

trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134641287
Author:
Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:
Pearson College Div
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780393639407
Author:
Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
Sociology
ISBN:
9781305503076
Author:
Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134477596
Author:
Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:
PEARSON
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134205571
Author:
James M. Henslin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134206325
Author:
John J. Macionis
Publisher:
PEARSON