What is the null hypothesis for the above urine test for glucose?that glucose in the urine is a consequence of supernatural eventsthat glucose in the urine is not a consequence of natural eventsthat glucose in the urine is not a consequence of diabetesthat glucose in the urine is a consequence of diabetesall of the aboveCompared to the above urine test, a blood test for glucose is more accurate in avoiding both false positive and false negative results in identifying diabetic patients. If a blood test for glucose correctly identifies 90% of diabetic patients, but gives false-positive results for 12% of non-diabetic patients, then:the blood glucose test has improved sensitivity, but reduced specificity (compared to the urine test)the blood glucose test has improved neither sensitivity nor specificity (compared to the urine test)the blood glucose test has reduced both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test)the blood glucose test has improved both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test)the blood glucose test has improved specificity, but reduced sensitivity (compared to the urine test)

The objective of the question is to identify the null hypothesis for a urine test for glucose and to…

Answered: What is the null hypothesis for the…

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)

11th Edition

ISBN:9780134580999

Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Question

What is the null hypothesis for the above urine test for glucose?

that glucose in the urine is a consequence of supernatural events
that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of natural events
that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of diabetes
that glucose in the urine is a consequence of diabetes
all of the above

Compared to the above urine test, a blood test for glucose is more accurate in avoiding both false positive and false negative results in identifying diabetic patients. If a blood test for glucose correctly identifies 90% of diabetic patients, but gives false-positive results for 12% of non-diabetic patients, then:
the blood glucose test has improved sensitivity, but reduced specificity (compared to the urine test)
the blood glucose test has improved neither sensitivity nor specificity (compared to the urine test)
the blood glucose test has reduced both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test)
the blood glucose test has improved both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test)
the blood glucose test has improved specificity, but reduced sensitivity (compared to the urine test)

AI-Generated Solution

AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.

Unlock instant AI solutions

Tap the button
to generate a solution

Click the button to generate
a solution

SEE SOLUTION

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions