What is the most appropriate analysis given the results on testing of assumptions? Justify your answer

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

What is the most appropriate analysis given the results on testing of assumptions? Justify your answer

Problem: Mr. Kinalabaw, an owner of a mango plantation, is worried about the
increasing number of fruit piercing moths present in most of the mango trees in his
farm. He then asked for Concon's help, his trusted statistician, in resolving the
problem. They identified two types of pesticide (1, 2) and two methods of
application (A, B). They applied each treatment combination to 3 fruit piercing
moths. Their survival time (in minutes) was recorded.
Pesticide
Method of
Application
Survival Time (in minutes)
A
31
29
30
1
B
28
30
27
A
23
18
20
2
B
17
15
18
data: Pesticide 1 Method A data:
Pesticide 1 Method B
Shapiro-Wilk normality test
Shapiro-Wilk normality test
W 1.00000,
W 0.96429,
p-value 1.0000
p-value 0.6369
data: Pesticide 2 Method A data:
data: Pesticide 2 Method B
Shapiro-Wilk normality test Shapiro-Wilk normality test
W 0.98684
0.96429
p-value 0.7804
p-value 0.6369
Bartlett test of homogeneity of variances
data: survival time by trmcombin
Bartlett's K-squared 1.4136, df 3, p-value 0.7024
Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center "mean")
DE F value Pr (>F)
group 3 0.8718 0.4947
8
Anova Table (Type II testa)
Response: survival time
method
pesticide
Sum Sq Df value
Pr (>F)
21.33 1 7.1111 0.02851.
341.33 1 113.7778 0.000005232 ***
0.34659
methodipesticide 3.00 1 1.0000
Residuals
24.00 8
。
---
Signif. codes: 0 0.001 0.01 0.05 0.1
Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test
data: survival time by trmcombin
Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared 9.6573, df 3, p-value = 0.02172
Transcribed Image Text:Problem: Mr. Kinalabaw, an owner of a mango plantation, is worried about the increasing number of fruit piercing moths present in most of the mango trees in his farm. He then asked for Concon's help, his trusted statistician, in resolving the problem. They identified two types of pesticide (1, 2) and two methods of application (A, B). They applied each treatment combination to 3 fruit piercing moths. Their survival time (in minutes) was recorded. Pesticide Method of Application Survival Time (in minutes) A 31 29 30 1 B 28 30 27 A 23 18 20 2 B 17 15 18 data: Pesticide 1 Method A data: Pesticide 1 Method B Shapiro-Wilk normality test Shapiro-Wilk normality test W 1.00000, W 0.96429, p-value 1.0000 p-value 0.6369 data: Pesticide 2 Method A data: data: Pesticide 2 Method B Shapiro-Wilk normality test Shapiro-Wilk normality test W 0.98684 0.96429 p-value 0.7804 p-value 0.6369 Bartlett test of homogeneity of variances data: survival time by trmcombin Bartlett's K-squared 1.4136, df 3, p-value 0.7024 Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center "mean") DE F value Pr (>F) group 3 0.8718 0.4947 8 Anova Table (Type II testa) Response: survival time method pesticide Sum Sq Df value Pr (>F) 21.33 1 7.1111 0.02851. 341.33 1 113.7778 0.000005232 *** 0.34659 methodipesticide 3.00 1 1.0000 Residuals 24.00 8 。 --- Signif. codes: 0 0.001 0.01 0.05 0.1 Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test data: survival time by trmcombin Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared 9.6573, df 3, p-value = 0.02172
Test
Conclusion
p-value
0.7024
Homogeneity of Variances
Since 0.7024 > 0.05 at = 5%, we
do not have enough evidence to
conclude that the variances are
not homogenous
Shapiro-Wilk Normality Test
p-value
Conclusion
1.0000
*TC1: Pesticide 1, Method
Application A
0.6369
*TC2: Pesticide 1, Method of
Application B
We can assume normality for all
the treatment combinations since
their p-value > 0.05 at 5%.
*TC3: Pesticide 2, Method of
0.7804
Application A
*TC4: Pesticide 2, Method of
0.6369
Application B
*TC - Treatment Combination
What is the most appropriate analysis given the results on testing of assumptions?
Justify your answer.
Transcribed Image Text:Test Conclusion p-value 0.7024 Homogeneity of Variances Since 0.7024 > 0.05 at = 5%, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the variances are not homogenous Shapiro-Wilk Normality Test p-value Conclusion 1.0000 *TC1: Pesticide 1, Method Application A 0.6369 *TC2: Pesticide 1, Method of Application B We can assume normality for all the treatment combinations since their p-value > 0.05 at 5%. *TC3: Pesticide 2, Method of 0.7804 Application A *TC4: Pesticide 2, Method of 0.6369 Application B *TC - Treatment Combination What is the most appropriate analysis given the results on testing of assumptions? Justify your answer.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman