What is the chi-squared test statistic for this data set?What is the appropriate degrees of freedom value for this test? b.What is the critical value that you would use to determine if there is a difference in the distributions of fish sizes across the different lakes? c.Select a conclusion statement from a list of choices.(photo attached

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

2w.need help with parts a-c

a.What is the chi-squared test statistic for this data set?What is the appropriate degrees of freedom value for this test?

b.What is the critical value that you would use to determine if there is a difference in the distributions of fish sizes across the different lakes?

c.Select a conclusion statement from a list of choices.(photo attached)

 

Consider a situation where an ecologist collects samples of fish from 4 different lakes named for their direction from a central location. They classify each captured
individual into one of three size categories and record the numbers.
Body size
Medium
29
29
25
17
Location Small
North
21
East
29
South
31
West
19
Large
50
42
44
64
Transcribed Image Text:Consider a situation where an ecologist collects samples of fish from 4 different lakes named for their direction from a central location. They classify each captured individual into one of three size categories and record the numbers. Body size Medium 29 29 25 17 Location Small North 21 East 29 South 31 West 19 Large 50 42 44 64
There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (p>0.05).
There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.025<p<0.05).
There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.02<p<0.025).
There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.01<p<0.02).
There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.001<p<0.01).
There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (p<0.001).
There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (p>0.
There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(0.025<p<0.05).
There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(0.02<p<0.025).
There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(0.01<p<0.02).
There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.001<p<0.01).
There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(p<0.001).
Transcribed Image Text:There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (p>0.05). There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.025<p<0.05). There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.02<p<0.025). There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.01<p<0.02). There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.001<p<0.01). There is good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (p<0.001). There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (p>0. There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(0.025<p<0.05). There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(0.02<p<0.025). There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(0.01<p<0.02). There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes (0.001<p<0.01). There is not good evidence that the distributions of sizes of fish appear to be different in the different lakes(p<0.001).
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman