What do you think the Romans cared more about: property or people? Second cite two passages from the twelve tables that support the answer above? Don’t reject please let someone else answer. Thank you
Transcribed Image Text: The Consequences of Imperialism
e of
o a life
elling or
Rome's seemingly inadvertent conquest of Gresce and western Asia transformed
the economic, social, and cultural life of the republic. New wealth increased the
inequalities within Roman society and challenged the traditional values of frugality
and self-sacrifice. Small farmers were forced off their lands and swelled the impov.
erished urban population, unable to compete with the huge new plantations owned
by aristocrats and worked by gangs of slaves. Slaves also played an increasing role in
Roman cities as artisans, merchants, and household servants. Roman rule over the
Hellenistic world had a particularly pervasive impact on cultural life-so much so
that many Romans felt intellectually and culturally "conquered" by Greece. Hitherto
self-assured, they now felt that their own language, history, and customs were uncouth
and barbaric compared with those of their cultivated colonial subjects.
owners would ger as much work our of them as possible until they died of exhaustion
or were "freed" in old age to fend for themselves. The same irascible Cato the Censor
who had demanded the destruction of Carthage even wrote a "how-to" book on this
Subject. This made Roman slavery a far more impersonal and brutal institution than
it had been in many other ancient civilizations. While some domestic slaves were
treated as trusted family members, and slave secretaries vital to Roman governance
and the arts could even win fame or buy their freedom, the general lot of slaves was
horrendous. Some businessmen owned slaves whom they trained as gladiators to be
mauled by wild animals or by other gladiators for the amusement of a paying pub-
lic. Dozens of slaves in every household were trapped in a cycle of menial tasks as
doorkeepers, litter-bearers, couriers, valets, wet nurses, and childminders. In some
great houscholds, designated slaves had no other duties than to rub down the master
after his bath or to keep track of the mistress's social engagements. It was a life that
debased both slave and owner, according
the republic.
people.
many Roman critics, and undermined
ECONOMIC CHANGE AND SOCIAL UPHEAVAL
Like all peoples of the ancient world, the Romans took slavery for granted. But
nothing in Rome's earlier experience prepared it for the huge increase in the num-
ber of slaves that resulted from its conquests. In 146 B.C.E., fifty-five thousand
Carthaginians were enslaved after the destruction of their city; not long before,
one hundred and fifty thousand Greek prisoners of war had met the same
fate.
alone. Rome became one of the most slave-based economies in history, rivaling
the antebellum American South.
The majority of Roman slaves worked as agriculteural laborers on the vast estates
of the Roman aristocracy, who bought up the holdings of peasant farmers. Soldiers
in particular, who might be required to serve for years at a time on foreign cam-
paigns, often found it impossible to maintain their farms. Instead, they moved to
the city-where free men had no way to sustain themselves except through trade or
violence. With abundant, cheap slaves to do all the rough work, moreover, there was
no impetus for technological innovation. Meanwhile, expensive slaves did the spe-
cialized jobs: they were secretaries, bookkeepers, personal assistants, playwrights,
musicians, sculptors, and artists. The Romans thus had almost no incentive to train
rhese arts, as the Greeks had done. By the first century B.C.E., as a result, a third
NEW MONEY, NEW VALUES
In the early republic, as we have seen, Roman men had nearly absolute power
over their households. During the second century B.C.E., two innovations greatly
altered this pattern of patriarchal control. One was the introduction of new laws
that allowed married women to manage their own property. Another allowed
women to initiate divorce proceedings. These changes were intended to safeguard
family wealth, but they eventually resulted in greater independence for women. A
woman now had more authority within the household because she contributed to
its upkeep. If her husband did not show respect, she could leave him and deprive
him of income. It is ironic, too, that the growth of Rome's slave system gave
women greater freedom, for slaves took over the traditional work of child-rearing,
household maintenance, and the endless tasks of spinning and
from well-to-do families now spent more time away from the home and began to
engage in social, intellectual, and artistic activities. Indeed, women were among
the chief consumers of the new Hellenistic fashions, commodities, and ideas
the end of the second century B.C.E., there were a million slaves in Italy
I weaving.
Women
in
of Rome's one million inhabitants were receiving free grain from the state, partly ro
kecp them alive and partly to keep them quiet. The poet Juvenal would later saririze
the plebs as needing only "bread and circuses" to stay satisfied and docile.
As ve have seen, the Roman economy had remained fundamentally agrarian uneil
che mid-third century B.C.E. During the following century, however, Rome's caster
available in Rome.
In earlier centuries,
elite Romans began to cultivate Hellenistic habits as proof of their refine-
ment. Bilingualism became increasingly common, and Greek literature became the
against which Roman authors measured themselves. Latin was fine for
Roma
way to
refine
standardgua
politics or farming, but if one wanted
so in Greek, which was far more flexible and sophisticated. Latin was not yet a liter-
ary language, and well-educated Greek slaves were therefore at a premium: to lend
social cachet,
But many Romans regarded these foreign influences with disgust. For them,
the good old ways of paternal authority and military discipline were giving way to
effeminacy and soft living. Conservative politicians passed laws that would regu-
late the conspicuous consumption, especially by women-but these measures were
ineffectual. Rome was being transformed from a republic of self-reliant farmers
into a complex metropolitan empire reliant on foreign slaves, foreign luxuries, and
foreign ideas.
express lofty or beautiful thoughts one did
the
mid-
brought it fully into the sophisticated commercial sphere of the Helle
merchants, they profited from Rome's voracious apperire fo
foreign
conquests bre
act as personal assistants, and to tutor Roman children.
lass
FRoman
-ks
Juxury
moneylenders to the Roman state and to distressed individuals
principal of its slaves. Even though some were
nistic world. The of this change were the class.
Commoners suffered but the
cultivated foreigners-mainly as prisoners of their
they operated mines, also the principal
As And as of the Roman in the provinces,
ization of Ancient Rome
Transcribed Image Text: Augustus to tell the story of Rome's rise to glory in a manner imitating the epics of
Homer. In one key passage, the father of Aeneas "foretells" the future: "Remember
Roman, you whose power rules / all peoples, that these are your arts: plant peace
/ make law, spare subjects, and put down the proud" (Aeneid, Book VI, lines 851–53).
While the Greeks struggled against the Persians and each other, a new civilization
had emerged on the banks of the river Tiber in central Italy. By 300 B.C.E., Rome was
their alleged descent from the Trojans and an Italic people called the Sabines, whose
women Romulus and his men had forcibly abducted in order to breed Roman chil-
dren. This was a practice Romans would continue, in one form or another, as their
legions planted new colonies and intermarried with indigenous populations from
the Persian Gulf to the lowlands of Scotland.
Lucretia According
Roman legend, Luc
ne
was a virtuous Rom
who was raped by
of Rome's last king
who virtuously com
the dominant power on the Italian peninsula. Two centuries later, it had conquered
e river
suicide in order to
THE FOUNDING OF ROME
hrst century of our era, it ruled the fo drter that, its power steadily increased. In the
Hellenistic
bringing shame to
family.
The real founders of Rome were a tribe called the Latins, descendants of Indo-
European-speaking peoples who crossed the Alps into Italy and settled on the
banks of the Tiber by the tenth century B.C.E. This location was advantageous. Small
trading ships (but not large war fleets) could navigate the river as far as the city,
but no farther; thus Rome could be a commercial port but was not threatened by
attack from the sea. Rome also sat astride the first good ford across the river, making
it a major crossroads. The seven hills that ringed the early settlement also offered
strategic advantages. Eventually, Rome's central marketplace-the forum or "open
space"-would become the beating heart of the world's most populous and powerful
city, with approximately a million people crowded into an area of five s
The topography of Latium-a broad, flat plain with few natural obstacles-also
influenced the Romans' relationships with outsiders because it lacked natural bound-
aries. At an early date, they and their neighbors negotiated a series of
lectively known as the Latin Right: a trading pact, provisions for intermarriage, and the
migratio, which allowed a resident of one settlement to emigrate to another and, after a
year's residence, have the full rights of a citizen there. These privileges contrast strongly
with the mutual suspicion and hostility that divided the city-states of ancient Mesopo-
tamia and Greece. Indeed, the Romans' later willingness to extend
colonies far beyond Latium was a key factor in the success of their empire.
The Romans' early government
Roman households, with a patriarchal king who exercised power checked only by a
council of elders, the Senate (derived from the Latin senex, "old man"). Seven kings,
beginning with Romulus, are said to have ruled in succession. The last, Tarquinius
Superbus (Tarquin the Arrogant), is reputed to have been an Etruscan who domi-
nated Latium and the agriculturally wealthy district of Campania to the south. But
his power came at the price of Roman freedom, as was made clear when Tarquin's
son raped a virtuous Roman wife, Lucretia, around 510 B.C.E. When she committed
suicide
c kingdoms as well as a vast region
that Greek culture had never touched. Eventually, Rome's empire united the Mediter-
ranean world and most of western Asia while embracing provinces that are now parts
of France, Spain, Portugal, Britain, Belgium, Germany, Świtzerland, and the Balkan
states. Rome thus built a historical arc that joined Europe to the rich heritage of ancient
Mesopotamia and Egypt. Without Rome, European culture as we know it would not
exist, and neither would the political institutions that formed the United States. To
echo Polybius: "Can anything be more important than understanding this?"
square miles.
Rome's Early Influences
When the Romans arrived in Italy, the dominant inhabitants of the peninsula were a
people whom the Greeks called Tyrrhenians. To the Romans, they were Etruscans;
to us, they remain mysterious because their language (not a branch of Indo-European)
has never been fully deciphered. By the sixth century B.C.E., the Etruscans had
established a confederation of independent city-states in north-central Italy. They
were skilled metalworkers, artists, and architects, from whom the Romans later
took their knowledge
sports and the practice of foretelling the future by studying the entrails of animals
and the flight of birds.
The two most important foundation myths told by the Romans also derived
from Etruscan tradition: the story of Aeneas's escape from Troy and the story of the
infant twins Romulus and Remus, abandoned and then raised by a maternal wolf.
afterward founding a city. Rome's historians mined both legends for their metaphor-
ical significance. For example, the story of Aeneas's seduction and abandonment of
Dido, queen of Carthage, reflected Rome's defeat of that powerful civilization, And
for many Roman commentators, the murder of Remus at the hands of his brorher
Romulus epitomized an all-too-familiar pattern in Roman politics.
In marked contrast to women in Greek society, Etruscan women enjoyed very
high status and played important roles in public life. They participated in politics.
sports, and entertainments; wives even ate meals with their husbands. Afrer d
devoted couples were buried together and their tombstones often emphasize their
mutual affection. Some of these practices certainly affected the
Reman women were markedly less sequestered than their Greek counterparts. Yer
s of agreements col-
The Latin Ric
eices
rhe Latin Right to
of the arch and the vault. They also took the love of blood
of rheir
verinent was a monarchy that mirrored the
structure of
avoid dishonor.
overthrowing not only the Etruscan dynasty but rejecting the very
the
Romans-led
by Lucretia's kinsman, Brutus-rose
up in rebellion,
idea of kingship. Henceforth, any claim to royal authority in Rome was considered
anathema, and the word rex ("king") became an insult. The Brutus who would be
instrumental in the assassination of Julius Caesar nearly five centuries later was a
descendant of the same Brutus who had driven out the Tarquin kings.
Romans, since
they did not enjoy the same freedoms as Etruscan women until very late in Ro
history, when these freedoms were condemned as signs of Rome's decadence
The Triumph of the Early Republic
The story of Lucretia was both a patriotic myth and a potent statement of Roman atti-
nudes toward female chastity and family honor. And it coincided with a radical change
to Roman governance-so radical, in fact, that it did not match any of Aristotle's
aces
sans:
Italy and Sicily: their alphabet, many of their religious beliefs, and much of thein
gious
art
of Ancient Rome
art. Bur in their legends, emphasizing
The Romans also from the southern