We are now also given an array of integers A = {a;}"-1, and some random integer k. 1. Develop an algorithm that returns an array B of all pairs of indices (i, j), such that i and j belong to {1, ...,n}, and (a; + a;)/2 = k. 2. Obtain the running time of the suggested algorithm. 3. Prove correctness of this algorithm by stating and proving a loop invariant. Exercise 3 Suppose we wish to revisit exercise 2 above, and we are given that the list A is sorted in increasing order. 1. Develop an algorithm that solves the same problem as exercise 2 above, but uses Binary search to reduce the number of comparisons needed. 2. Verify that the run-time of the proposed algorithm is indeed faster. How much is it, and why is it faster?

Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN:9780133594140
Author:James Kurose, Keith Ross
Publisher:James Kurose, Keith Ross
Chapter1: Computer Networks And The Internet
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem R1RQ: What is the difference between a host and an end system? List several different types of end...
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
This is exercise 2
We are now also given an array of integers A =
{a;}"=1, and some random integer k.
1. Develop an algorithm that returns an array B of all pairs of indices (i, j), such that i and
j belong to {1, ...,n}, and (a; + a;)/2 = k.
2. Obtain the running time of the suggested algorithm.
3. Prove correctness of this algorithm by stating and proving a loop invariant.
Exercise 3
Suppose we wish to revisit exercise 2 above, and we are given that the list A is sorted in
increasing order.
1. Develop an algorithm that solves the same problem as exercise 2 above, but uses Binary
search to reduce the number of comparisons needed.
2. Verify that the run-time of the proposed algorithm is indeed faster. How much is it, and
why is it faster?
Transcribed Image Text:This is exercise 2 We are now also given an array of integers A = {a;}"=1, and some random integer k. 1. Develop an algorithm that returns an array B of all pairs of indices (i, j), such that i and j belong to {1, ...,n}, and (a; + a;)/2 = k. 2. Obtain the running time of the suggested algorithm. 3. Prove correctness of this algorithm by stating and proving a loop invariant. Exercise 3 Suppose we wish to revisit exercise 2 above, and we are given that the list A is sorted in increasing order. 1. Develop an algorithm that solves the same problem as exercise 2 above, but uses Binary search to reduce the number of comparisons needed. 2. Verify that the run-time of the proposed algorithm is indeed faster. How much is it, and why is it faster?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edi…
Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edi…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780133594140
Author:
James Kurose, Keith Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Fi…
Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Fi…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780124077263
Author:
David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy
Publisher:
Elsevier Science
Network+ Guide to Networks (MindTap Course List)
Network+ Guide to Networks (MindTap Course List)
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781337569330
Author:
Jill West, Tamara Dean, Jean Andrews
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Concepts of Database Management
Concepts of Database Management
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093422
Author:
Joy L. Starks, Philip J. Pratt, Mary Z. Last
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Prelude to Programming
Prelude to Programming
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780133750423
Author:
VENIT, Stewart
Publisher:
Pearson Education
Sc Business Data Communications and Networking, T…
Sc Business Data Communications and Networking, T…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781119368830
Author:
FITZGERALD
Publisher:
WILEY