Use this information to anwer the question: Babesia microti is a red cell parasite that is endemic in the Northeastern and upper Midwestern regions of the US and responsible for the disease referred to as babesiosis. The parasite is most often transmitted by the bite of a deer tick but may also be transmitted by blood. Infection may be asymptomatic or cause non-specific symptoms: fever, fatigue, headache and muscle pain, or in some cases severe disease in those with a compromised immune system, hemoglobin-related diseases (such as sickle cell disease) or those lacking a spleen. The Red Cross began blood donation screening under an investigational protocol in June 2012 in the New England area and upper Midwest. Donors who consented for investigational screening were tested by two tests: an individual donation NAT assay (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) and an antibody assay, the latter using an automated indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Reactive donations were further tested by various methods to confirm infection including more sensitive PCR methods and western blot. The frequency of detecting an infected donor in an endemic area where screening had occurred was about 1 per 300 donations using both antibody and NAT. In the absence of screening, the risk of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis is generally about 1 per 100,000 unscreened donations in an endemic state but maybe as high as 1 per 18,000 in highly endemic areas. Unscreened blood in a highly endemic area is 16 times more likely to be infectious than screened blood (where screened blood has not been associated with a transmission). In May 2018, the Red Cross began testing from whole blood samples using a NAT assay, now FDA licensed, that detects ribosomal RNA of the parasite following red cell lysis, thereby greatly increasing sensitivity and obviating the need for antibody testing; because the lysis step releases thousands of copies of babesia RNA, mini-pool testing can be performed (MPs of 16). If a reactive donation is identified, testing is repeated, and a sample is sent for antibody testing by IFA. In May 2019, the FDA released guidance to test all donations collected in the following states considered babesia endemic or contiguous to an endemic state: Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Rhode Island, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota, and Wisconsin and in the District of Columbia. Red Cross will implement the guidance testing in May 2020.   The best standard for determining a Babesia test is to see the organism on a blood smear. Why is this not the test used for screening?

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
icon
Related questions
Question

 Use this information to anwer the question:

Babesia microti is a red cell parasite that is endemic in the Northeastern and upper Midwestern regions of the US and responsible for the disease referred to as babesiosis. The parasite is most often transmitted by the bite of a deer tick but may also be transmitted by blood. Infection may be asymptomatic or cause non-specific symptoms: fever, fatigue, headache and muscle pain, or in some cases severe disease in those with a compromised immune system, hemoglobin-related diseases (such as sickle cell disease) or those lacking a spleen. The Red Cross began blood donation screening under an investigational protocol in June 2012 in the New England area and upper Midwest. Donors who consented for investigational screening were tested by two tests: an individual donation NAT assay (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) and an antibody assay, the latter using an automated indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Reactive donations were further tested by various methods to confirm infection including more sensitive PCR methods and western blot. The frequency of detecting an infected donor in an endemic area where screening had occurred was about 1 per 300 donations using both antibody and NAT. In the absence of screening, the risk of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis is generally about 1 per 100,000 unscreened donations in an endemic state but maybe as high as 1 per 18,000 in highly endemic areas. Unscreened blood in a highly endemic area is 16 times more likely to be infectious than screened blood (where screened blood has not been associated with a transmission). In May 2018, the Red Cross began testing from whole blood samples using a NAT assay, now FDA licensed, that detects ribosomal RNA of the parasite following red cell lysis, thereby greatly increasing sensitivity and obviating the need for antibody testing; because the lysis step releases thousands of copies of babesia RNA, mini-pool testing can be performed (MPs of 16). If a reactive donation is identified, testing is repeated, and a sample is sent for antibody testing by IFA. In May 2019, the FDA released guidance to test all donations collected in the following states considered babesia endemic or contiguous to an endemic state: Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Rhode Island, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota, and Wisconsin and in the District of Columbia. Red Cross will implement the guidance testing in May 2020.

 

The best standard for determining a Babesia test is to see the organism on a blood smear. Why is this not the test used for screening?

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Disease transmission
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education