Suppose the members of population A, consisting of Al, Bob, Curt, Doris, and Ellie, receive annual incomes of $5,000, $2,500, $1,250, $750, and $500, respectively. What percentage of total income is received by the highest 60 percent of the income receivers in population A? Multiple Choice O O O O 87.5 25 60 76.5 < Prev 5 of 10 www www www Ne Suppose the members of population A, consisting of Al, Bob, Curt, Doris, and Ellie, receive annual incomes of $5,000, $2,500, $1,250, $750, and $500,respectively. What percentage of total income is received by the highest 60 percent of the income receivers in population A?Multiple ChoiceO87.5256076.5< Prev5 of 10Ne >

To calculate the percentage of total income received by the highest 60 percent of the income…

uppose the members of population A, consisting of Al, Bob, Curt, Doris, and Ellie, receive annual incomes of $5,000, $2,500, $1,250, $750, and $500, respectively. What percentage of total income is received by the highest 60 percent of the income receivers in population A? Multiple Choice O O O O 87.5 25 60 76.5

uppose the members of population A, consisting of Al, Bob, Curt, Doris, and Ellie, receive annual incomes of $5,000, $2,500, $1,250, $750, and $500, respectively. What percentage of total income is received by the highest 60 percent of the income receivers in population A? Multiple Choice O O O O 87.5 25 60 76.5

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter2: Mathematics For Microeconomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2.15P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $24,000, $18,000, $50,000, $100,000, $12,000, $36,000, $80,000, $10,000, $24,000, $16,000. Calculate the share of total income that each quintile receives from this income distribution. Do the top and bottom quintiles in this distribution have a greater or larger share of total income than the top and bottom quintiles of the U.S. income distribution?
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Calculate the share of total income each quintile of this income distribution received. Do the top and bottom quintiles in this distribution have a greater or larger share of total income than the top and bottom quintiles of the U.S. income distribution for 2005?
(SW 7.10) Show that the two alternative formulas below for the homoscedasticity-only F-statistic are equivalent. F = (SSRrestricted − SSRunrestricted) /q SSRunrestricted/ (n − kunrestricted − 1) (equation 7.13 in SW) F = R2 unrestricted − R2 restricted /q (1 − R2 unrestricted) / (n − kunrestricted − 1) (equation 7.14 in SW)
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 If $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner, would that increase or decrease the share of income held by the top quintile? Would this transfer increase or decrease the share of income held by the bottom quintile? Would this have any effect on the 2nd quintile? The 3rd? The 4th? Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to the overall utility of the…
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to overall utility in the economy? Would it increase, decrease, or remain the same? Explain your answer. (Hint: does the marginal utility of income diminish as one earns more?)
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 If $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner, would that increase or decrease the share of income held by the top quintile? Would this transfer increase or decrease the share of income held by the bottom quintile? Would this have any effect on the 2nd quintile? The 3rd? The 4th? Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to overall utility in the…
If in 2009 Indonesia had a Gini index of income distribution of 36.8 and Brazil had a Gini index of 53.9 this means: Select one: That the income distribution was more equal in Brazil than in Indonesia.. That 36.8% of the population in Indonesia and 53.9% of the population in Brazil had an income that was below the average off their respective country. That only 36.87% of the population in Indonesia and 53.97% of the population in Brazil participate in the income redistribution policies of their respective country. O c. Od. That the income distribution was more equal in Indonesia than Brazil. O a. O b.
Officials in fluxemburg are concerned about the current level of income inequality in their country, where the highest quintile of families currently earns 60% of the country's income. The central government has income information on its citizenry, and they want you to help them interpret the data from a 15-year period. The following table gives data on how families have moved between income quintiles between the years shown. ral in the missing values in the distribution table for familles in Fluxemburg; then use the information in the table to answer the following questions. Income Distribution in 2007 (Percent) Third Quintile Fourth Quintile Lowest Quintile Income Distribution in 1992 Highest Quintile Second Quintile Highest Quintile Second Quintile Third Quintile Fourth Quintile Lowest Quintile 65 12 13 51 18 8 12 -0* 52 Looking at families in the lowest quintile of income in 1992 (bottom row), you can report that higher quintile of income distribution by 2007. 6 10 16 57 11 5 14 66…
6. During an evolution, the minimum, maximum, and average fitness of a population is 1.2, 270, and 40, respectively. If the most fit individual is to be 3 time more likely than the average fit individual to be selected, and the least fit individual is l1/3 as likely as the average fit individual to be selected, what is the scaled fitness of an individual whose raw fitness is 58.
Suppose that education does not affect worker's productivity, but it is more costly for low-ability workers to obtain the education. If firms cannot distinguish between different workers they must pay them all the wage equal to the expected productivity. If they can distinguish between workers with different abilities, they pay each worker their marginal product of labour and make zero profits. 70% of workers in the population have low ability. The productivity of low-ability workers is Y, = 20000, and the productivity of high-ability workers is Yµ = 50000. The cost of education to high-ability workers is CH(S) = . and the cost of education to low-ability workers is CL = S. 1. Suppose firms cannot observe worker's education. What wage will they offer to a high- ability worker? What is the optimal level of schooling for the high-ability worker? Why? 2. Suppose that firms can observe worker's educational attainment and believe that workers with the level of schooling above some benchmark…
9
Suppose that education does not affect worker’s productivity, but it is more costly for low-ability workers to obtain the education. If firms cannot distinguish between different workers they must pay them all the wage equal to the expected productivity. If they can distinguish between workers with different abilities, they pay each worker their marginal product of labour and make zero profits. 70% of workers in the population have low ability. The productivity of low-ability workers is YL = 20000, and the productivity of high-ability workers is YH = 50000. The cost of education to high-ability workers is CH(S) = S 4 , and the cost of education to low-ability workers is CL = S. (Answer 4.5.6 only) 1. Suppose firms cannot observe worker’s education. What wage will they offer to a highability worker? What is the optimal level of schooling for the high-ability worker? Why? 2. Suppose that firms can observe worker’s educational attainment and believe that workers with the level of…