If the area between the diagonal line of absolute equality and the Lorenz curve is greater for China than for the United States, we can conclude that theDistribution of income in China is less equal than in the United States.Relative distributions of income in the two countries are the same.O Distribution of income in China is as equal as in the United States.O Distribution of income in China is closer to being equal than in the United States.

Evaluating income disparities is akin to refining a musical masterpiece, revealing the concealed…

If the area between the diagonal line of absolute equality and the Lorenz curve is greater for China than for the United States, we can conclude that the O Distribution of income in China is less equal than in the United States. O Relative distributions of income in the two countries are the same. Distribution of income in China is as equal as in the United States. Distribution of income in China is closer to being equal than in the United States.

If the area between the diagonal line of absolute equality and the Lorenz curve is greater for China than for the United States, we can conclude that the O Distribution of income in China is less equal than in the United States. O Relative distributions of income in the two countries are the same. Distribution of income in China is as equal as in the United States. Distribution of income in China is closer to being equal than in the United States.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4. An economist produced the following Lorenz curves for the current income distribution and the projected income distribution 10 years from now in a certain country: Current Lorenz curve: f(x) = 0.15x+0.85x Projected Lorenz curve: g(x) = x'6 Compute the Gini index of income concentration ( to 2 decimal places ) for the current and projected curves. What can you say about the distribution of income 10 years from now? Is it more equitable or less?
The tables show the (approximate) distributions of money income in the United States and Canada United States Cumulative percentage of Households Income Lowest 40 Lowest BO 12 50 Canada Cumulative percentage of Households Income Lowest 40 16 Lowest Bo 56 Draw the line of equality Draw the Lorenz curve for the United States Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 80 percent of households. Label it U.S. Draw the Lorenz curve for Canada. Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 40 percent of households Labelit Canada Based on this data, which country has the more unequal distribution? OA. Canada B. The United States OC. It is impossible to tell without more information OD. Neither. They have the same degree of inequality 100 90- 00 70- 60- 60- 40- 30- 20 10 Cumulative percentage of income 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Cumulative percentage of households >>>Draw only the objects specified in the question. G
The FGT0 measure does not reflect the depth of poverty below the poverty line. [6] (i) Suggest a specific income transfer within this economy that demonstrates this limitation of FGT0. Take $1 from person 2 and give it to person 4. This makes person 2 poorer in absolute terms, but does not change FGT0. (ii) Compute FGT0 after the transfer. Still 3/6. (iii)Discuss why this feature limits how useful FGT0 is as a measure of poverty. FGT0 is not able to capture changes among the poor. For example, the desperately poor could become much better off and, as long as they weren’t so much better off that they cross the poverty line, we would see no improvement in poverty as measured by FGT0.
If the Gini coefficient of a nation in 1980 was 0.50 and in 2020 it was 0.40, the nation's O income inequality is less in 2020 O income inequality is more in 2020 O tax system is less progressive in 2020 O tax system is more progressive in 2020
37
Suppose that the economy of Loserville has the following distribution of income: first quintile 15% of aggregate income second quintile 20% of aggregate income third quintile 20% of aggregate income fourth quintile 20% of aggregate income fifth quintile 25% of aggregate income a. From the information provided, please derive a Lorenz Curve for Loserville. Show graphically. b. From the Lorenz Curve you have drawn, find the Gini Coefficient. c. How does Loserville compare to the United States economy?
Wealth, earnings, and disposable income are just three of several ways of looking at inequality. Imagine a household that earns $80,000 per year from labor. In that year, it also receives an income of $3,000 from investments, pays $12,000 in tax, and receives $7,000 in transfers from the state. Which of the following is its market income and its disposable income? O $83,000; $71,000. O $83,000 $78,000. O $80,000; $68,000. O $80,000; $75,000. J
K In recent years, as the gap between the rich and the poor has increased, the Lorenz curve has O A. shifted away from the line of equality OB. shifted closer to the line of equality O c. not changed, but there has been a movement down along it O D. not changed, but there has been a movement up along it Ne
Use the data from the table below to construct a Lorenz curve. Income Shares in the United States Lowest 20% Second Lowest 20% Third 20% Fourth 20% Highest 20% 5.2 10.3 15.3 22.4 46.9
Questions Explain three methods of measuring the income inequality of a nation? 1.kuznet ratio 2. Lorenz curve 3. Gini coefficient As in the case of income distribution, calculation of wealth distribution is done by different entities using different measurements, resulting in a disparity in outcomes. In fact, commonly, wealthis narrowly defined as financial wealth—namely, cash on handand the money value of tangible and nonliquid assets. Even justthe market valuation of financial portfolios is commonly used todefine financial wealth. However, some may extend the definitionto include the value of income streams and insurance rights that,for the most part, cannot be transacted or encumbered. Theseinclude Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. When suchtransfers and public assistance are included, the poor and manyelderly could benefit, reducing the wealth disparity (Galbraith2016). To obtain net wealth, the value of the debts are subtractedsubtracted from the value of the assets.…
Consider an economy with 4000 people and the following income distribution: each person in the bottom quartile of the income distribution earns $10 dollars per hour; each person in the 2nd quartiles earns $20 dollars per hour; each person in the 3rd quartiles earns $25 dollars per hour;and each person in the top quartile of the income distribution earns $45 dollars per hour. (2) Suppose the bottom quartile pays no taxes, the 2nd quartiles pay 10% its income in taxes, the 3rd pays 20% and the top quartile pays 40% of its income in taxes. 80% of all tax money is redistributed equally to all citizens in the form of military defense, government pensions (social security), roads/highways, etc. The remaining tax money is distributed entirely to the poorest quartile. What is the Gini coefficient associated with this redistribution plan?