U.S. Health Care System, and key policy issues like cost, quality, and access. If you were a policy maker, pick two of the issues you would focus on, and what specific barriers you would attempt to address, and why.
U.S. Health Care System, and key policy issues like cost, quality, and access. If you were a policy maker, pick two of the issues you would focus on, and what specific barriers you would attempt to address, and why.
The U.S. Health Care System, and key policy issues like cost, quality, and access. If you were a policy maker, pick two of the issues you would focus on
COST Evidence of the low price of our health care has semiconductor diode researchers to do to spot specific sources of wasteful payment. several of those efforts have evaluated regional variation in payment patterns particularly Medicare spending within us. By finding that regional variation in payment isn't typically related to patient outcomes suggesting that some regions’ practices weren't cost effective this literature captured the eye of policymakers and sparked public and personal sector proposals to cut back unwarranted variation in treatment. Recent proof suggests, however, that higher-intensity care could improve patient outcomes, job into question what proportion we tend to stand to realize by reducing “waste” in health care payment. during this paper, we tend to summarize what's best known regarding the connection between health care payment and quality of care and also the current efforts to cut back unwarranted variation in care.
QUALITY that higher-intensity care could improve patient outcomes. A recent study evaluated the connection between the intensity of care and quality in NY State by exploiting the quasi-random assignment of patients to hospitals supported by machine referral patterns. The researchers found that higher procedure intensity was related to lower mortality one year once hospitalization. Similarly, Silber and colleagues according to a relationship between larger care intensity and lower mortality within thirty days once admission among Medicare beneficiaries World Health Organization received general, orthopedic, and vascular surgery between 2000 and 2005. The ablated mortality wasn't because of fewer complications but rather of fewer deaths among those with complications. Outside of this 30-day window, however, Silber and colleagues found that patients from lower- and higher-intensity hospitals were no additional possible to measure or die within the following year when patients come to identical “baseline hazard” of death once extant that 1st month. Amber Barnato understood these results as that means that “better hospital quality improves safety (e.g., survival conditional upon hospitalization), however, it doesn't improve population health (e.g., longer anticipation or slowed useful decline)”. whereas US medical manpower has intensive specialty experience in intensive medical treatments, the present healthcare system could fail to rate low-priced, low-intensity healthcare interventions (for example, vaccinations) that might dramatically improve overall public health.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
