U.S. firms would sometimes threaten their workers with moving their jobs to low- wage Mexico if they dared ask for higher wages and benefits. Thus caused wage stagnation. All of the above statements are true and correct. The U.S. lost over 800,000 good-paying manufacturing jobs and created a Rust Belt (a depressed area) in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan. The old 1993 NAFTA deal was never updated to allow smaller businesses to take advantage of new opportunities created by the Internet. Smaller U.S. businesses were routinely left out of lucrative markets that were often taken over by larger U.S. firms that had more neqotiating leveraqe.
U.S. firms would sometimes threaten their workers with moving their jobs to low- wage Mexico if they dared ask for higher wages and benefits. Thus caused wage stagnation. All of the above statements are true and correct. The U.S. lost over 800,000 good-paying manufacturing jobs and created a Rust Belt (a depressed area) in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan. The old 1993 NAFTA deal was never updated to allow smaller businesses to take advantage of new opportunities created by the Internet. Smaller U.S. businesses were routinely left out of lucrative markets that were often taken over by larger U.S. firms that had more neqotiating leveraqe.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
![12. What were some of the bad results of
the 1993 NAFTA trade deal from the U.S.
point of view?
Multiple Choice
U.S. firms would sometimes threaten their
workers with moving their jobs to low-
wage Mexico if they dared ask for higher
wages and benefits. Thus caused wage
stagnation.
All of the above statements are true and
correct.
The U.S. lost over 800,000 good-paying
manufacturing jobs and created a Rust
Belt (a depressed area) in states like
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and
Michigan.
The old 1993 NAFTA deal was never
updated to allow smaller businesses to
take advantage of new opportunities
created by the Internet. Smaller U.S.
businesses were routinely left out of
lucrative markets that were often taken
over by larger U.S. firms that had more
negotiating leverage.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F6622b0f1-719e-4125-a6f2-a7834efef46f%2F00e1827c-5931-4083-bd68-5bf4f117e585%2F6m2hoan_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:12. What were some of the bad results of
the 1993 NAFTA trade deal from the U.S.
point of view?
Multiple Choice
U.S. firms would sometimes threaten their
workers with moving their jobs to low-
wage Mexico if they dared ask for higher
wages and benefits. Thus caused wage
stagnation.
All of the above statements are true and
correct.
The U.S. lost over 800,000 good-paying
manufacturing jobs and created a Rust
Belt (a depressed area) in states like
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and
Michigan.
The old 1993 NAFTA deal was never
updated to allow smaller businesses to
take advantage of new opportunities
created by the Internet. Smaller U.S.
businesses were routinely left out of
lucrative markets that were often taken
over by larger U.S. firms that had more
negotiating leverage.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305585126/9781305585126_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337106665/9781337106665_smallCoverImage.gif)
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259290619/9781259290619_smallCoverImage.gif)
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education