The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Both the quality of management and the reputation of the company were rated on an excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for 200 respondents below applies to this study. Quality of Management Reputation of Company Excellent Good Fair Excellent 40 25 5 Good 35 28 10 Fair 25 17 15 (a) Use a 0.05 level of significance and test for independence of the quality of management and the reputation of the company. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is not equal across companies with differing reputations.    H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is equal across companies with differing reputations.H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)   Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value =  State your conclusion. Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating of the reputation of the company.    Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the ratings for the quality of management and the reputation of the company are not independent.Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is not independent of the rating for the reputation of the company. (b) If there is a dependence or association between the two ratings, discuss and use probabilities to justify your answer. For companies with an excellent reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to      management quality. For companies with a good reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to      management quality. For companies with a fair reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to      management quality. Since these highest probabilities correspond to     ratings of quality of management and reputation, the two ratings are     .

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
You may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question.
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Both the quality of management and the reputation of the company were rated on an excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for 200 respondents below applies to this study.
Quality of Management Reputation of Company
Excellent Good Fair
Excellent 40 25 5
Good 35 28 10
Fair 25 17 15
(a)
Use a 0.05 level of significance and test for independence of the quality of management and the reputation of the company.
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is not equal across companies with differing reputations.    H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is equal across companies with differing reputations.H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
 
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value = 
State your conclusion.
Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating of the reputation of the company.    Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the ratings for the quality of management and the reputation of the company are not independent.Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is not independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.
(b)
If there is a dependence or association between the two ratings, discuss and use probabilities to justify your answer.
For companies with an excellent reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to      management quality. For companies with a good reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to      management quality. For companies with a fair reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to      management quality. Since these highest probabilities correspond to     ratings of quality of management and reputation, the two ratings are     .
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman