Can you help me in doing the analysis and conclusion considering those questions which are in the analysis part? Thank you Electric FieldDirection onlyVoltageValuesGrid0.0 V+1 nC-1 nCSensorsCharges and FieldsPHET =000 000 000+ + + + + + + + Procedure 2• Click the reset swirly, turn of the electric field, turn on thegrid.• Stack a few charges of each kind on top of each other asshown in the picture.• Create 10 equipotentials in the space around the charges.• Observe the shape and line density in the space around thecharges.• Screenshot for your report.AnalysisThere should be an obvious trend in your observations. If not, add more charges and repeat theexercise until you see it. You've created a reasonable facsimile of charged parallel plates.Discuss your model in your report. What does your physics knowledge tell you about the fieldbetween parallel plates? Do your observations bear that out? Text books like to talk aboutinfinite plates, but infinity is math not physics. What happens to electric field in the regionsoutside the plates?00000

We have study the analysis; and according to the experiment conclude data for the given situations;

There should be an obvious trend in your observations. If not, add more charges and repeat the exercise until you see it. You've created a reasonable facsimile of charged parallel plates. Discuss your model in your report. What does your physics knowledge tell you about the field between parallel plates? Do your observations bear that out? Text books like to talk about infinite plates, but infinity is math not physics. What happens to electric field in the regions outside the plates?

There should be an obvious trend in your observations. If not, add more charges and repeat the exercise until you see it. You've created a reasonable facsimile of charged parallel plates. Discuss your model in your report. What does your physics knowledge tell you about the field between parallel plates? Do your observations bear that out? Text books like to talk about infinite plates, but infinity is math not physics. What happens to electric field in the regions outside the plates?

College Physics

11th Edition

ISBN:9781305952300

Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille

Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille

Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How do I solve for this? Number 1 is already given
When coverting metric measures I am having a hard time understanding the coversion concept?
Compute the Pearson correlation for the following data x= 12, 3, 16, 24, 15 y=29, 41, 9, 1, 10
State how many significant figures are proper in the results of the following calculations. (a) (36.842100) (265) (46.210) (2) (b) (5.9)² (c) (356.23 x 10-19) (3712)
WRITE IN PROPER ROUNDED FORM m = 14.26506 grams, Am = 0.00251 grams. (uncertainty) M = 7.35 x 102 kg AM = 4.62 x 1020kg (uncertainty) (show all work)
A marathon runner completes a 42.188-km course in 2 h, 35 min, and 39 s. There is an uncertainty of 28 m in the distance traveled and an uncertainty of 1 s in the elapsed time. (Give all answers to the appropriate number of significant figures. Note that uncertainties should be reported to one significant figure and percent uncertainties should be reported to two significant figures.) (a) Calculate the percent uncertainty in the distance. _________% (b) Calculate the percent uncertainty in the elapsed time. __________%
WHY IS IT INCORRECT TO SAY THE RESULTS I GOT FROM THE MEASUREMENTS WHERE ACCURATE NOT PRECISE
A biologist has a 6894-gram sample of a radioactive substance. Find the mass of the sample after two hours if it decreases according to a continuous exponential decay model, at a relative rate of 9% per hour. Do not round any intermediate computations, and round your answer to the nearest tenth. grams
If two different theories describe experimental observations equally well, can one be said to be more valid than the other (assuming both use accepted rules of logic)?
Could someone please explain to me what a negative relative error means? I got a relative error value of -30% in my lap and am unsure of what this means in terms of accuracy and percision of my lab data/experiment. Any help would be great thank you!