There are some design goals Jessica has in mind for a new programming language she is working on: Free and open-source software is what the programming language is designed for. Yes, it's OK if your computer system just has a strong processor and the most up-to-date software. It would be useful if programs were able to run across a variety of platforms without the programmer having to make any additional effort. It should be possible to edit the program's source code while it is still running. It's not clear what sort of software Jessica should write: an interpreter or a compiler.

There are some design goals Jessica has in mind for a new programming language she is working on: Free and open-source software is what the programming language is designed for. Yes, it's OK if your computer system just has a strong processor and the most up-to-date software. It would be useful if programs were able to run across a variety of platforms without the programmer having to make any additional effort. It should be possible to edit the program's source code while it is still running. It's not clear what sort of software Jessica should write: an interpreter or a compiler.

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter3: Data Representation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2RP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jessica is considering creating a new programming language, and she has the following goals in mind for its design: The programming language is designed for producing free and open-source software. It's OK for the language to only run smoothly on really advanced and powerful computer systems. It would be handy if programs could run on several platforms without the programmer having to exert any additional effort. It should be possible to modify the program's source code while it is still running. Should Jessica create an interpreter, a compiler, or something else different instead?
Jessica has certain design goals in mind for a new programming language she wants to create: the language will be optimized for the development of open-source and free applications. It's OK if the language can only run smoothly on super-high-end computers. It would be helpful if software could run on several operating systems with no additional work from the developer. It should be possible to make modifications to the program's source code even while it is running. The question is whether Jessica ought to create an interpreter, a compiler, or some other form of software.
Jessica is considering creating a new programming language, and she has certain goals in mind for its structure. The language is optimized for the development of free and open-source applications. It's OK if the language can only run on supercomputers or the most advanced personal computers. It would be helpful if software could run on several operating systems with no additional work from the developer. Source code modifications should be possible even when the application is running. What kind of program should Jessica create—an interpreter, a compiler, or something else entirely?
Jessica has certain goals in mind for the layout of a new programming language she hopes to create. The language is optimized for the development of free and open-source applications. It's OK if the language can only run on super-high-end hardware. If software could automatically adapt to new operating systems, it would be very useful. Changing the program's source code while it's being run should be possible. What type of program does Jessica need to create—an interpreter, a compiler, or something else entirely?
Does using an open-source language have any advantages or disadvantages over using a proprietary programming language? To put it another way, try to envision how your company's software development requirements would be handled if you were the language creator, the programmer, and the company that utilizes the language.
Jessica wants to create a new programming language and has certain goals in mind for its structure: The language is designed for the development of free and open-source software. It's OK if the language can only run on super-high-end hardware. It would be helpful if software could automatically adapt to new operating systems. The program's source code should be modifiable even while it runs. What type of program should Jessica create—an interpreter, a compiler, or something else entirely?
There are six reasons why you should know how to use a compiler.
What are the advantages of utilizing a language that is compiled as opposed to one that is interpreted? What circumstances do you believe it would be advantageous to utilize an interpreter in?
Is it beneficial for programmers who already have experience in a variety of programming languages to continue their education and learn more languages?
Compiler education is a topic that comes up in casual discussion rather often, and its motivations are often discussed.
Compiler and interpreter are two distinct tools.
Having experience with many languages should alleviate the pressure on a programmer to quickly master new ones.