Then, using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after telling about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all of the key stakeholde and how you feel they were impacted. For example, if someone released compa records and emails to blow the whistle, discuss whose emails and how the information led to actions against them. If no one was negatively impacted, ther why use it for this case study? Discuss the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your mora compass to describe or explain why you feel someone's actions were morally wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors involved were thinki or what motivation they may or may not have had. What matters is ONLY your beliefs about whether the actions were morally right or wrong. Use named mora theories to support your position. Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was some whistle blown? Finally, imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from feeling a ne to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may feel the real wrongdoe is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why what the company/government did is doing is justified, again using your moral theories.

Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN:9780133594140
Author:James Kurose, Keith Ross
Publisher:James Kurose, Keith Ross
Chapter1: Computer Networks And The Internet
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem R1RQ: What is the difference between a host and an end system? List several different types of end...
icon
Related questions
Question
  • CO 3: Evaluate the possible consequences of poorly reasoned actions.
    • LO 3.1: Examine the outcomes of various whistleblower situations.
  • CO 4: Examine differences in actions and outcomes based on the status of stakeholders.
    • LO 4.1: Differentiate relevant stakeholders and possible consequences of poorly reasoned actions related to whistleblowing.
  • CO 5: Critique different levels of responsibility relevancy for various stakeholders.
    • LO 5.1: Justify suitable actions to bring about morally justifiable outcomes related to whistleblowing.

 

Please find an article or news story about some whistle-blowing situation. Please do not use high-profile cases like Snowden or Manning. If you can find the same story described by different sources all the better. Do not use some personal experience unless it was discussed in credible new sources. I need to be able to verify the account. 

 

Then, using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after telling me about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all of the key stakeholders and how you feel they were impacted. For example, if someone released company records and emails to blow the whistle, discuss whose emails and how the information led to actions against them. If no one was negatively impacted, then why use it for this case study? 

 

Discuss the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your moral compass to describe or explain why you feel someone’s actions were morally wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors involved were thinking or what motivation they may or may not have had. What matters is ONLY your beliefs about whether the actions were morally right or wrong. Use named moral theories to support your position. Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was some whistle blown? 

 

Finally, imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do to keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from feeling a need to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may feel the real wrongdoer is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why what the company/government did or is doing is justified, again using your moral theories.

 

 

Then, using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after telling
about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all of the key stakeholde
and how you feel they were impacted. For example, if someone released compa
records and emails to blow the whistle, discuss whose emails and how the
information led to actions against them. If no one was negatively impacted, ther
why use it for this case study?
Discuss the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your mora
compass to describe or explain why you feel someone's actions were morally
wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors involved were thinki
or what motivation they may or may not have had. What matters is ONLY your
beliefs about whether the actions were morally right or wrong. Use named mora
theories to support your position. Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was
some whistle blown?
Finally, imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do
keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from feeling a ne
to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may feel the real wrongdoe
is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why what the company/government did
is doing is justified, again using your moral theories.
Transcribed Image Text:Then, using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after telling about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all of the key stakeholde and how you feel they were impacted. For example, if someone released compa records and emails to blow the whistle, discuss whose emails and how the information led to actions against them. If no one was negatively impacted, ther why use it for this case study? Discuss the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your mora compass to describe or explain why you feel someone's actions were morally wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors involved were thinki or what motivation they may or may not have had. What matters is ONLY your beliefs about whether the actions were morally right or wrong. Use named mora theories to support your position. Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was some whistle blown? Finally, imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from feeling a ne to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may feel the real wrongdoe is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why what the company/government did is doing is justified, again using your moral theories.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edi…
Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edi…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780133594140
Author:
James Kurose, Keith Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Fi…
Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Fi…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780124077263
Author:
David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy
Publisher:
Elsevier Science
Network+ Guide to Networks (MindTap Course List)
Network+ Guide to Networks (MindTap Course List)
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781337569330
Author:
Jill West, Tamara Dean, Jean Andrews
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Concepts of Database Management
Concepts of Database Management
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093422
Author:
Joy L. Starks, Philip J. Pratt, Mary Z. Last
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Prelude to Programming
Prelude to Programming
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9780133750423
Author:
VENIT, Stewart
Publisher:
Pearson Education
Sc Business Data Communications and Networking, T…
Sc Business Data Communications and Networking, T…
Computer Engineering
ISBN:
9781119368830
Author:
FITZGERALD
Publisher:
WILEY