Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
Theme 2 (of 3) Another major aim is to characterize judgments of taste particularly How does Kant differentiate the pleasant vs. the beautiful vs. the good? What does he mean when he says that judgements of taste are 'disinterested'? What is the point of his example about the judgement of taste that a rose is beautiful? Any idea what he means by 'subjective universality'? Logical/Cognitive Judgments (one kind discussed here, but there are others) KANT CHART Aesthetic Judgments (only three kinds) Judgments of Moral Goodness (i.e., that something should be esteemed) (e.g., honesty) Judgments of Taste (ie., that something is beautiful/pleasurable) (e.g., a rose, a palace, Thai food) Judgments of Gratification (i.e., that something is agreeable) (e.g., any food when hungry) Judgments of Sublimity (ie, that something is awe- inspiring, involving both some pleasure and some displeasure) (e.g., cliffs, thunder) What do we know about these? Objective (or, about the object of inquiry) What do we know about these? Universally Subjective (or, about a kind of feeling the subject has though this feeling has the character of making an objective claim) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) Also: The pleasure is disinterested (not about purpose), and the judgement is about a particular (not a generalization).

Theme 2 (of 3) Another major aim is to characterize judgments of taste particularly How does Kant differentiate the pleasant vs. the beautiful vs. the good? What does he mean when he says that judgements of taste are 'disinterested'? What is the point of his example about the judgement of taste that a rose is beautiful? Any idea what he means by 'subjective universality'? Logical/Cognitive Judgments (one kind discussed here, but there are others) KANT CHART Aesthetic Judgments (only three kinds) Judgments of Moral Goodness (i.e., that something should be esteemed) (e.g., honesty) Judgments of Taste (ie., that something is beautiful/pleasurable) (e.g., a rose, a palace, Thai food) Judgments of Gratification (i.e., that something is agreeable) (e.g., any food when hungry) Judgments of Sublimity (ie, that something is awe- inspiring, involving both some pleasure and some displeasure) (e.g., cliffs, thunder) What do we know about these? Objective (or, about the object of inquiry) What do we know about these? Universally Subjective (or, about a kind of feeling the subject has though this feeling has the character of making an objective claim) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) Also: The pleasure is disinterested (not about purpose), and the judgement is about a particular (not a generalization).

icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Hey, I’m working on an assignment, and my professor mentioned that she can tell if AI was used, so I’m trying to avoid that. This is an activity we just covered yesterday in class, but I’m really struggling with it and don’t have a clear idea of how to approach it. Can you help me figure this out? Theme #2: according to Kant, how do judgments of taste differ from judgements of gratification? To fully answer this not mos lestioned bike a or uring ed definitia get t of atten ta followed to loanation. Tee goal here is to demonstrate understanding by providing new examples. In answering this prompt, you should not use direct quotes. 2. Here's a chance to be creative: illustrate/draw/sketch an example of the sublime below. As with the first prompt, this needs to be a new example - i.e., not one mentioned in class. (If you're worried that you aren't an artistic genius, feel free to label/explain your drawing.) paraphrase or cite any external sources when answering the prompts above? If so, please identify those sources here. Don't worry about formatting, but do provide enough information to track down the source (e.g., the page name and the website that hosts that page).
Theme 2 (of 3) Another major aim is to characterize judgments of taste particularly How does Kant differentiate the pleasant vs. the beautiful vs. the good? What does he mean when he says that judgements of taste are 'disinterested'? What is the point of his example about the judgement of taste that a rose is beautiful? Any idea what he means by 'subjective universality'?
Transcribed Image Text:Theme 2 (of 3) Another major aim is to characterize judgments of taste particularly How does Kant differentiate the pleasant vs. the beautiful vs. the good? What does he mean when he says that judgements of taste are 'disinterested'? What is the point of his example about the judgement of taste that a rose is beautiful? Any idea what he means by 'subjective universality'?
Logical/Cognitive Judgments (one kind discussed here, but there are others) KANT CHART Aesthetic Judgments (only three kinds) Judgments of Moral Goodness (i.e., that something should be esteemed) (e.g., honesty) Judgments of Taste (ie., that something is beautiful/pleasurable) (e.g., a rose, a palace, Thai food) Judgments of Gratification (i.e., that something is agreeable) (e.g., any food when hungry) Judgments of Sublimity (ie, that something is awe- inspiring, involving both some pleasure and some displeasure) (e.g., cliffs, thunder) What do we know about these? Objective (or, about the object of inquiry) What do we know about these? Universally Subjective (or, about a kind of feeling the subject has though this feeling has the character of making an objective claim) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) Also: The pleasure is disinterested (not about purpose), and the judgement is about a particular (not a generalization).
Transcribed Image Text:Logical/Cognitive Judgments (one kind discussed here, but there are others) KANT CHART Aesthetic Judgments (only three kinds) Judgments of Moral Goodness (i.e., that something should be esteemed) (e.g., honesty) Judgments of Taste (ie., that something is beautiful/pleasurable) (e.g., a rose, a palace, Thai food) Judgments of Gratification (i.e., that something is agreeable) (e.g., any food when hungry) Judgments of Sublimity (ie, that something is awe- inspiring, involving both some pleasure and some displeasure) (e.g., cliffs, thunder) What do we know about these? Objective (or, about the object of inquiry) What do we know about these? Universally Subjective (or, about a kind of feeling the subject has though this feeling has the character of making an objective claim) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) What do we know about these? Merely Subjective (or, just about a kind of feeling the subject has) Also: The pleasure is disinterested (not about purpose), and the judgement is about a particular (not a generalization).
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer