The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 16 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 16 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 32 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. 4 Preservative I Preservative II X-96 54 hours 51-18.8 hours X106.4 hours 5-10.1 hours Suppose ax = 0.01. Which of the following represents the result of the relevant hypothesis test? 1) The null hypothesis is not rejected. 2) The null hypothesis is rejected. 3) The alternative hypothesis is rejected. 4) Insufficient information exists on which to make a decision.

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course List)
2nd Edition
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Chapter6: Statistical Inference
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 26P: Because of high production-changeover time and costs, a director of manufacturing must convince...
icon
Related questions
Question
The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue Suppose two preservatives are
extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their
effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 16 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 16 are treated with
preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 32 cuts of meat. The results
are summarized in the table below.
4
Preservative I
Preservative II
X-96 54 hours
51-18.8 hours
X106.4 hours
5-10.1 hours
Suppose ax = 0.01. Which of the following represents the result of the relevant
hypothesis test?
1) The null hypothesis is not rejected.
2) The null hypothesis is rejected.
3) The alternative hypothesis is rejected.
4) Insufficient information exists on which to make a decision.
Transcribed Image Text:The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats. A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage. Suppose 16 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 16 are treated with preservative II, and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 32 cuts of meat. The results are summarized in the table below. 4 Preservative I Preservative II X-96 54 hours 51-18.8 hours X106.4 hours 5-10.1 hours Suppose ax = 0.01. Which of the following represents the result of the relevant hypothesis test? 1) The null hypothesis is not rejected. 2) The null hypothesis is rejected. 3) The alternative hypothesis is rejected. 4) Insufficient information exists on which to make a decision.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …
Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305627734
Author:
Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305224414
Author:
JENNINGS
Publisher:
Cengage
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305970663
Author:
Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:
Cengage Learning