The types of browse favored by deer are shown in the following table. Using binoculars, volunteers observed the feeding habits of a random sample of 320 deer. Type of Browse Plant Composition in Study Area Observed Number of Deer Feeding on This Plant Sage brush 32% 99 Rabbit brush 38.7% 129 Salt brush 12% 44 Service berry 9.3% 27 Other 8% 21 Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the natural distribution of browse fits the deer feeding pattern. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: The distributions are the same. H1: The distributions are different.H0: The distributions are different. H1: The distributions are the same. H0: The distributions are the same. H1: The distributions are the same.H0: The distributions are different. H1: The distributions are different. (b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. (Round the expected frequencies to at least three decimal places. Round the test statistic to three decimal places.) Are all the expected frequencies greater than 5? YesNo What sampling distribution will you use? chi-square normal binomial Student's t uniform What are the degrees of freedom? (c) Estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic. P-value > 0.1000 .050 < P-value < 0.100 0.025 < P-value < 0.0500 .010 < P-value < 0.0250. 005 < P-value < 0.010 P-value < 0.005 (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis that the population fits the specified distribution of categories? Since the P-value > ?, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value > ?, we reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value ≤ ?, we reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value ≤ ?, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. At the 5% level of significance, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that the natural distribution of browse does not fit the feeding pattern.At the 5% level of significance, the evidence is insufficient to conclude that the natural distribution of browse does not fit the feeding pattern.

The types of browse favored by deer are shown in the following table. Using binoculars, volunteers observed the feeding habits of a random sample of 320 deer. Type of Browse Plant Composition in Study Area Observed Number of Deer Feeding on This Plant Sage brush 32% 99 Rabbit brush 38.7% 129 Salt brush 12% 44 Service berry 9.3% 27 Other 8% 21 Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the natural distribution of browse fits the deer feeding pattern. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: The distributions are the same. H1: The distributions are different.H0: The distributions are different. H1: The distributions are the same. H0: The distributions are the same. H1: The distributions are the same.H0: The distributions are different. H1: The distributions are different. (b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. (Round the expected frequencies to at least three decimal places. Round the test statistic to three decimal places.) Are all the expected frequencies greater than 5? YesNo What sampling distribution will you use? chi-square normal binomial Student's t uniform What are the degrees of freedom? (c) Estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic. P-value > 0.1000 .050 < P-value < 0.100 0.025 < P-value < 0.0500 .010 < P-value < 0.0250. 005 < P-value < 0.010 P-value < 0.005 (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis that the population fits the specified distribution of categories? Since the P-value > ?, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value > ?, we reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value ≤ ?, we reject the null hypothesis. Since the P-value ≤ ?, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. At the 5% level of significance, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that the natural distribution of browse does not fit the feeding pattern.At the 5% level of significance, the evidence is insufficient to conclude that the natural distribution of browse does not fit the feeding pattern.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Question

The types of browse favored by deer are shown in the following table. Using binoculars, volunteers observed the feeding habits of a random sample of 320 deer.

Type of Browse	Plant Composition in Study Area	Observed Number of Deer Feeding on This Plant
Sage brush	32%	99
Rabbit brush	38.7%	129
Salt brush	12%	44
Service berry	9.3%	27
Other	8%	21

Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the natural distribution of browse fits the deer feeding pattern.

(a) What is the level of significance?

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

H₀: The distributions are the same.
H₁: The distributions are different.H₀: The distributions are different.
H₁: The distributions are the same. H₀: The distributions are the same.
H₁: The distributions are the same.H₀: The distributions are different.
H₁: The distributions are different.

(b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. (Round the expected frequencies to at least three decimal places. Round the test statistic to three decimal places.)

Are all the expected frequencies greater than 5?

YesNo

What sampling distribution will you use?

chi-square

normal

binomial

Student's t

uniform

What are the degrees of freedom?

(c) Estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic.

P-value > 0.1000

.050 < P-value < 0.100

0.025 < P-value < 0.0500

.010 < P-value < 0.0250.

005 < P-value < 0.010

P-value < 0.005

(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis that the population fits the specified distribution of categories?

Since the P-value > ?, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Since the P-value > ?, we reject the null hypothesis.

Since the P-value ≤ ?, we reject the null hypothesis.

Since the P-value ≤ ?, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

At the 5% level of significance, the evidence is sufficient to conclude that the natural distribution of browse does not fit the feeding pattern.At the

5% level of significance, the evidence is insufficient to conclude that the natural distribution of browse does not fit the feeding pattern.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Point Estimation, Limit Theorems, Approximations, and Bounds$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.