The term “bleeding heart liberal” is due to the (supposed) excess sympathy that liberals feel for criminals, the poor, the sick, and other marginalized groups. At the same time, however, members of marginalized groups are also more likely to be liberal, arguably because they themselves have experienced circumstances that make them more empathetic to the plight of others. If this hypothesis is true, we might expect that self-proclaimed liberals would have higher mean scores on an index capturing the number of “bad things” that have happened to them in the last year. In the GSS, of 56 persons claiming to be “strong conservatives,” the mean score on such an index was 3.75 (sd = 4.15), while, of 46 persons claiming to be “strong liberals,” the mean score on the index was 4.4 (sd = 2.30). Is the hypothesis reasonable
-
The term “bleeding heart liberal” is due to the (supposed) excess sympathy that liberals feel for criminals, the poor, the sick, and other marginalized groups. At the same time, however, members of marginalized groups are also more likely to be liberal, arguably because they themselves have experienced circumstances that make them more empathetic to the plight of others. If this hypothesis is true, we might expect that self-proclaimed liberals would have higher mean scores on an index capturing the number of “bad things” that have happened to them in the last year. In the GSS, of 56 persons claiming to be “strong conservatives,” the mean score on such an index was 3.75 (sd = 4.15), while, of 46 persons claiming to be “strong liberals,” the mean score on the index was 4.4 (sd = 2.30). Is the hypothesis reasonable?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
