The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood test that is considered fairly reliable. It gives a positive reaction in 96.8% of the people who have that disease. However, it erroneously gives a positive reaction in 5.8% of the people who do not have the disease. Consider the null hypothesis "the individual does not have the disease" to answer the following questions. a. What is the probability of a Type l error? (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.) Probability

The screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood test that is considered fairly reliable. It gives a positive reaction in 96.8% of the people who have that disease. However, it erroneously gives a positive reaction in 5.8% of the people who do not have the disease. Consider the null hypothesis "the individual does not have the disease" to answer the following questions. a. What is the probability of a Type l error? (Round your answer to 3 decimal places.) Probability

Name: Exercise 9-11 AlgoThe screening process for detecting a rare disease
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Exercise 9-11 AlgoThe screening process for detecting a rare disease is not perfect. Researchers have developed a blood test that is considered fairlyreliable. It gives a positive reaction in 96.8% of the people who have that disease. However, it er

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Refer to the sample data for polygraph tests shown below. If one of the test subjects is randomly selected, what is the probability that the subject is not lying? Is the result close to the probability of 0.476 for a negative test result? Did the Subject Actually Lie? No (Did Not Lie) Yes (Lied) Positive test results 16 39 Negative test results 36 14 The probability that a randomly selected polygraph test subject was not lying is (Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed.) Is the result close to the probability, rounded to three decimal places, of 0.476 for a negative test result? because there is a 0.050 absolute difference between the probability of a true response and the probability of a negative test result.
What’s P value???
Refer to the sample data for polygraph tests shown below. If one of the test subjects is randomly selected, what is the probability that the subject is not lying? Is the result close to the probability of 0.4720.472 for a negative test result? Did the Subject Actually Lie? No (Did Not Lie) Yes (Lied) Positive test results 1414 4343 Negative test results 3737 1414 The probability that a randomly selected polygraph test subject was not lying is _____.
a particular hypothesis test is left-tailed, and the area to the left of the test statistic is 0.20. what is the p-value?
In the book A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicators by Myers and McCaully, it was reported that approximately 45% of all university professors are extroverted. Suppose you have classes with three different professors. In a group of three professors selected at random, what is the expected number of extroverts? extrovertsWhat is the standard deviation of the distribution? (Round your answer to two decimal places.) extroverts(e) Suppose you were assigned to write an article for the student newspaper and you were given a quota (by the editor) of interviewing at least three extroverted professors. How many professors selected at random would you need to interview to be at least 93% sure of filling the quota? (Enter the smallest number of professors needed.) professors
Have you ever tried to get out of jury duty? About 25% of those called will have an excuse to avoid jury duty. If 12 people are called for jury duty: What is the probability that all 12 will be available to serve on the jury? What is the probability that 6 or more will not be available to serve on the jury? Find the expected number (average number) of those available to serve on the jury? What is the standard deviation?
Refer to the sample data for polygraph tests shown below. If one of the test subjects is randomly selected, what is the probability that the subject is not lying? Is the result close to the probability of 0.443 for a negative test result? Did the Subject Actually Lie? No (Did Not Lie) Yes (Lied) O Positive test results 10 44 Negative test results 36 The probability that a randomly selected polygraph test subject was not lying is (Type an integer or decimal rounded to three decimal places as needed.) Is the result close to the probability, rounded to three decimal places, of 0.443 for a negative test result? because there is V a 0.050 absolute difference between the probability of a true response and the probability of a negative test result. Enter your answer in the answer box. Prise 6. LEGO
Which of these examples violates a basic assumption for a chi-square hypothesis test? a. A participant produces responses that can be counted twice in the same category. b. The expected frequency of a category is less than 10. c. A category includes frequencies or counts instead of scores. d. The population distribution for a category is not normal.
Evaluate the significance of the p-value. You can think of the p-value as the probability that the null hypothesis is true. A value greater than 0.05 indicates that in more than 1 in 20 (or more than 5%) repetitions of an experiment of the same size, the observed deviation from predicted valuescould have been obtained by chance, even if the null hypothesis is actually true; the data are therefore not significant for rejecting the null hypothesis. Statisticians have arbitrarily selected the 0.05 p-value as the boundarybetween rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. A p-value of less than 0.05 means that you can consider the deviation to be significant, and you can reject the null hypothesis.
A new treatment for a certain disease is claimed to be effective in more than 80 % of cases . To test this claim the treatment was given to 100 randomly selected patients . The treatment was effective in 85 out of the 100 patients . What is the conclusion at a 5 % level of significance ? A. Reject the null hypothesis .There is sufficient evidence to claim that the treatment is effective in more than 80 % of cases B. Reject the null hypothesis .There is not sufficient evidence to claim that the treatment is effective in more than 80 % of cases C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to claim that the treatment is effective in more than 80 % of cases D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to claim that the treatment is effective in more than 80 % of cases
It is widely believed that 19% of all students live in campus housing. You suspect that claim is not accurate. You take a sample of 150 students from the population and find that 39 of those students live in campus housing. The parts that I am having trouble with are: Assuming the null is true, how many standard errors is the sample proportion away from the null? Assuming the null is true, on average, how far would a sample proportion be from the expected population proportion? I know that the answer for each part is 2.19 and 0.0320. I am struggling to remember the steps to get to the answer.
What does brand loyalty mean to consumers? According to a recent research report, 38% of consumers associate trust with brand loyalty. To conduct a follow-up study that would provide 95% confidence that the point estimate is correct to within ±0.02 of the population proportion, how large a sample size is required? A sample size of ___ consumers is required.