the result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:What is the result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?
O a. This case established the exclusionary rule that any illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court.
O b. Police officers must read a suspect his or her rights upon arrest; otherwise, the case against the defendant must be dismissed.
O cifa defendant is not read his or her rights upon arrest, a confession cannot be used in court unless it is given voluntarily.
O d. If a police officer fails to read a suspect his or her rights upon arrest, the suspect's confession cannot be used in court.
O e. The confession of a defendant who has not been read his or her rights upon arrest may be used in court, but the defendant may bring a civil suit against the
arresting officer.
0- Icon Key
19
MacBook Air
F10
F5
F7
F8
F4
F3
F1
2$
&
@
4
5
6
7
9
2
Y
Q
W
E
K
A
S
F
C
V
co
* c0
つ
エ
>
B
D
%#3
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
