the relationship between CI's and hypothesis tests: (a) You calculate a 90% confidence interval for μ and come up with (-26, 10). If you test H0: μ = -7 and use α = .10, will you reject H0? Why or why not? (b) Now you calculate a 95% CI for μ and come up with (-5, -1). If you test H0: μ = 0 and use α = .10, will you reject H0? Why or why not? (c) Finally, you calculate a 95% CI for for μ and come up with (-24, -8). If you test H0: μ = - 13 and use α = .01, will you reject H0? Why or why not

the relationship between CI's and hypothesis tests: (a) You calculate a 90% confidence interval for μ and come up with (-26, 10). If you test H0: μ = -7 and use α = .10, will you reject H0? Why or why not? (b) Now you calculate a 95% CI for μ and come up with (-5, -1). If you test H0: μ = 0 and use α = .10, will you reject H0? Why or why not? (c) Finally, you calculate a 95% CI for for μ and come up with (-24, -8). If you test H0: μ = - 13 and use α = .01, will you reject H0? Why or why not

Name: Let's examine the relationship between CI's and hypothesis tests:(a) Y
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Let's examine the relationship between CI's and hypothesis tests:(a) You calculate a 90% confidence interval for μ and come up with (-26, 10). If you test H0: μ = -7 and use α = .10, will you reject H0? Why or why not?(b) Now you calculate a 95% CI f

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You run a regression analysis on a bivariate set of data (n=66n=66). You obtain the regression equation y=−0.208x+24.034 with a correlation coefficient of r=−0.93 (which is significant at α=0.01). You want to predict what value (on average) for the explanatory variable will give you a value of 40 on the response variable.What is the predicted explanatory value?x = _________(Report answer accurate to one decimal place.)
You have determined that in the past three years there 7 of the 14 were hand injuries. Previous projections had indicated that under normal conditions, only four hand injuries were expected and 12 other injuries were expected. The remaining injuries were due to other causes. Calculate the chi-square value and discuss whether there was a significant difference in observed data vs. the expected data. Also discuss how the process of hypothesis testing might prove helpful o = 7 hand injuries and 7 other injuriese = 4 expected hand injuries and 12 other injuries
Please answer this question for me because i do not understand how to work it.
X. is found to be 19.1, and the A simple random sample of sizen is drawn from a population that is normally distributed. The sample mean, sample standard deviation, s, is found to be 4.9. (a) Construct a 96% confidence interval about u if the sample size, n, is 39. (b) Construct a 96% confidence interval about u if the sample size, n, is 68. How does increasing the sample size affect the margin of error, E? (c) Construct a 98% confidence interval about u if the sample size, n, is 39. How does increasing the level of confidence affect the size of the margin of error, E? (d) If the sample size is 14, what conditions must be satisfied to compute the confidence interval? (a) Construct a 96% confidence interval about u if the sample size, n, is 39. Lower bound: Upper bound: (Round to two decimal places as needed.) (b) Construct a 96% confidence interval about u if the sample size, n, is 68. Lower bound: ; Upper bound: (Round to two decimal places as needed.) How does increasing the sample…
please check this. The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 14%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 324 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 32 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.05 level of significance? For this study, we should use The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: (please enter a decimal) H1: (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is αα Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 14% at αα = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders…
You have taken a random sample of sizen & 95of a normal population that has a population mean ofμ = 140and a population standard deviation ofo = 23. Your sample, which is Sample 1 in the following table, has a mean ofx = 141.3. (In the table, Sample 1 is indicated by "M1", Sample 2 by "M2", and so on.) (to) Based on Sample 1, plot the confidence intervals of80%and95%for the population mean. Use1,282as the critical value for the confidence interval of 80%and use1960 as the critical value for the confidence interval of95%. (If necessary, you can refer to a list of formulas .) • Write the upper limit and the lower limit on the graphs to indicate each confidence interval. Write the answers with one decimal place. • For the points (♦and ◆), write the population mean, μ = 140. 128.0 128.0 80% confidence interval 139.0 X Ś 150.0 150.0 128.0 128.0 95% confidence interval 139.0 X Ś 150.0 150.0
Heights (cm) and weights (kg) are measured for 100 randomly selected adult males, and range from heights of 138 to 190 cm and weights of 40 to 150 kg. Let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. The 100 paired measurements yield x = 167.88 cm, y = 81.51 kg, r=0.195, P-value = 0.052, and y= - 105 + 1.05x. Find the best predicted value of y (weight) given an adult male who is 184 cm tall. Use a 0.01 significance level. The best predicted value of y for an adult male who is 184 cm tall is kg. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Suppose that we would like to test the following hypotheses on the population correlation coefficient ρ: H0: ρ ≤ 0 and H1: ρ > 0. The sample correlation coefficient (r) for a sample with 7 observations (n = 7) on x and y is 0.35 . Then the test statistic t has a value of
Only about 18% of all people can wiggle their ears. Is this percent different for millionaires? Of the 374 millionaires surveyed, 45 could wiggle their ears. What can be concluded at the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: (please enter a decimal) H1:H1: (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value is αα Based on this, we should the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 18% at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of millionaires who can wiggle their ears is equal to 18%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 18% at αα = 0.01, so there is…