Q 4.18: A new material was tested to determine a correlation between external influence and stress in the material. The null hypothesis was Ho: p = 0. The alternative hypothesis was Ha: p + 0. The first test gave a significant result with the level of significance a = 0. 05. Then this test was repeated with a larger sample size at the same level of significance a = 0. 05. The second test gave the same value of the correlation as the first test. What can we say about the conclusion of the second test? A We cannot determine whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis, since the p-value is larger for the second test. We cannot determine whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis, since we cannot estimate the p-value for the second test. We reject the null hypothesis at a 5% level, since the p-value is larger for the second test. We reject the null hypothesis at a 5% level, since the p-value is smaller for the second test. E We cannot determine whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis, since the p-value is smaller for the second test.

Q 4.18: A new material was tested to determine a correlation between external influence and stress in the material. The null hypothesis was Ho: p = 0. The alternative hypothesis was Ha: p + 0. The first test gave a significant result with the level of significance a = 0. 05. Then this test was repeated with a larger sample size at the same level of significance a = 0. 05. The second test gave the same value of the correlation as the first test. What can we say about the conclusion of the second test? A We cannot determine whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis, since the p-value is larger for the second test. We cannot determine whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis, since we cannot estimate the p-value for the second test. We reject the null hypothesis at a 5% level, since the p-value is larger for the second test. We reject the null hypothesis at a 5% level, since the p-value is smaller for the second test. E We cannot determine whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis, since the p-value is smaller for the second test.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The correlation coefficient r is a sample statistic. What does it tell us about the value of the population correlation coefficient p i (Greek letter rho)? You do not know how to build the formal structure of hypothesis tests of p yet. However, there is a quick way to determine if the sample evidence based on p is strong enough to conclude that there is some population correlation between the variables. In other words, we can use the value of r to determine if p + 0. We do this by comparing the value Ir| to an entry in the correlation table. The value of a in the table gives us the probability of concluding that p + 0 when, in fact, p = 0 and there is no population correlation. We have two choices for a: a = 0.05 or a = 0.01. Critical Values for Correlation Coefficient r n a = 0.05 a = 0.01 a = 0.05 a = 0.05 a= 0.01 a= 0.01 3 1.00 1.00 13 0.53 0.68 23 0.41 0.53 4 0.95 0.99 14 0.53 0.66 24 0.40 0.52 0.88 0.96 15 0.51 0.64 25 0.40 0.51 0.81 0.92 16 0.50 0.61 26 0.39 0.50 0.61 0.59 0.58 7…
An automobile manufacturer claims that their van has a 50.5 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing firm has been contracted to test the MPG for this van. After testing 101 vans they found a mean MPG of 50.1 with a variance of 4 MPG. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.1 level that the vans have an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario. Answer Ho H₂ Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts
Suppose IQ scores were obtained for 20 randomly selected sets of couples. The 20 pairs of measurements yield x = 101.16, y = 102.3, r= 0.810, P-value = 0.000, and y = 23.09+0.78x, where x represents the IQ score of the wife. Find the best %3D %3D %3D predicted value of y given that the wife has an IQ of 109? Use a significance level of 0.05. Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. .... The best predicted value of y is . (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Critical values of the pearson correlation coefficient r NOTE: To test Ho: p = 0 against H,: p#0, reject Ho |if the absolute value of r is greater than the critical value in the table. a = 0.05 a = 0.01 4 0.950 0.990 0.878 0.959 0.811 0.917 0.754 0.875 0.707 0.834 0.666 0.798 10 0.632 0.765 11 0.602 0.735 12 0.576 0.708 13 0.553 0.684 14 0.532 0.661 15 0.514 0.641 16 0.497 0.623 17 0.482 0.606 18 0.468 0.590 19 0.456 0.575 20 0.444 0.561 25 0.396 0.505 30 0.361 0.463 35 0.335 0.430 40…
You are conducting a study to see if the proportion of men over 50 who regularly have their prostate examined is significantly different from 0.25. You use a significance level of α=0.01α=0.01. H0:p=0.25H0:p=0.25 H1:p≠0.25H1:p≠0.25You obtain a sample of size n=687n=687 in which there are 143 successes.What is the test statistic for this sample? (Report answer accurate to three decimal places.)test statistic = What is the p-value for this sample? (Report answer accurate to four decimal places.)p-value =
Listed below are the overhead widths (in cm) of seals measured from photographs and the weights (in kg) of the seals. Construct a scatterplot, find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, and find the critical values of r using a = 0.05. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between overhead widths of seals from photographs and the weights of the seals? Overhead Width Weight Click here to view a table of critical values for the correlation coefficient. n 300 Aweight (kg) Q 100+ 7 width (cm) 10 Q 7.1 111 7.7 172 9.6 239 Aweight (kg) 300+ 100+ The linear correlation coefficient is r= (Round to three decimal places as needed.) 9.4 204 + width (cm) 10 8.6 196 Q 8.1 183 Aweight (kg) 300- 100 7 width (cm) 10 Q Aweight (kg) 300- 100+ width (cm) 10 Q
An airport official wants to prove that the proportion of delayed flights for Airline A (denoted as p1) is less than the proportion of delayed flights for Airline B (denoted as p2). Random samples for both airlines after a storm showed that 51 out of 200 flights for Airline A were delayed, while 60 out of 200 of Airline B's flights were delayed. The test statistic for this problem is -1.00. The p-value for the test statistic for this problem is: p = 0.0228 p = 0.0668 p = 0.3413 p = 0.1587
In 1990, the average duration of long-distance telephone calls originating in one town was 9.4 minutes. A long-distance telephone company wants to perform a significance test to determine whether the average duration of long-distance phone calls has changed from the 1990 mean of 9.4 minutes. The hypotheses are: H0: μ = 9.4 minutes HA: μ ≠ 9.4 minutesSuppose that the results of the sample lead to non-rejection of the null hypothesis. Classify that conclusion as a Type I error, a Type II error, or a correct decision, if in fact the mean duration of long-distance phone calls has changed from the 1990 mean of 9.4 minutes. Choose the best asnwer below: A. Neither B. Type I error C. Type II error D.No error
The accompanying table lists the ages of acting award winners matched by the years in which the awards were won. Construct a scatterplot, find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, and find the P-value of r. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of linear correlation between the two variables. Should we expect that there would be a correlation? Use a significance level of = 0.05. E Click the icon to view the ages of the award winners. Construct a scatterplot. Choose the correct graph below. OA. OB. Oc. OD. 70- 70- Q 70- 70- ... ++++++ 20 - 20 Best Actress (years) 20- 70 20 Best Actress (years) 20- 20 Best Actress (years) 70 20 Best Actress (years) 70 70 Best Actresses and Best Actors Best Actress 27 29 30 58 33 34 46 30 62 22 44 51 D Best Actor 44 36 38 44 53 46 56 49 41 52 44 33
5. We don't want predictor variables that are too highly correlated with each other or they are redundant (say ≥±.70) or multicollinear (2±.90), which means the variables are measuring pretty much the same thing so why have them all in the equation. What was the finding for redundancy between SPI Scientist and SPI Practitioner? a. No issue with redundancy since the shared variance between the two variables was only 4% (r2 = .04). b. There was an issue with redundancy between the two variables shared 62% of the variance in the relationship.
A researcher randomly assigns college freshmen to either of two experimental conditions. Because both groups consist of college freshmen, someone claims that it is appropriate to use a t test for the two related samples. Comments?
A new method was developed to reduce variability of test scores by eliminating lower scores. Two groups, one called the control group and the other, the experimental group, both took the same test. The experimental group was taught using the new method. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that there is less variation among scores when the new method is used? Perform an F-test at the 1% significance level. (Note: s, = 6.3 and Control Experimental 30 19 29 26 33 36 29 18 33 31 S2 = 3.3.) 33 18 19 32 27 32 29 30 33 ... .. First find the null and alternative hypotheses. Which of the following correctly states the hypotheses? O A. Ho: 01 72 Ha: 01 = 02 O B. Ho: 01 >02 Ha: 0102 Ha: 01 #02 O E. Ho: 01 =02 Ha: 01 02 nts SCO Compute the test statistic F. Scor (Round to three decimal places as needed.) ess
Using a sample that has n=50 pair of data, we get a correlation coefficient r=-0.269 for the following null and alternative hypotheses determine and compute the test statistic value: HO: p=0 H1: pe 0 O a t=7.51 O b. z=7.51 O o.z=-0. 16 Odt=-1.08