need help please! The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 13%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if thesex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 348 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 31 ofthem became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a= 0.01 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use Select an answerb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: ?Select an answerH₁: ?Select an answerc. The test statistic?d. The p-value=e. The p-value is ? ✓ af. Based on this, we shouldg. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...=(please enter a decimal)(Please enter a decimal)(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)Select an answer the null hypothesis.O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 13% at a = 0.01, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 13%.The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 13% at a = 0.01, so thereis statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sexoffender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 13%.O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 13% at c = 0.01, sothere is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 13%.h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O There is a 1.16% chance that fewer than 13% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts becomerepeat offenders.There is a 13% chance of a Type I error.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 13% and if another 348 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a1.16% chance that fewer than 9% of the 348 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the studybecome repeat offenders.O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offendersis 9% and if another 348 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would bea 1.16% chance of concluding that fewer than 13% of convicted sex offender drug addictsbecome repeat offenders.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is lower than 13% and if another 348 convicted sex offender drug addicts areobserved then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that theproportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to13%.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 13% and if another 348 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of allconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 13%.O There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders is lower than 13%.

n = 348, X = 31, p = 13% = 0.13Note : According to bartelby question answer guidelines an expert can…

The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 13%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 348 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 31 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the ax = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer H₁: Select an answer ✓ c. The test statistic ? (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)