The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 13%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 309 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 31 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a= 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use [Select an answer The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: ? Select an answer H₁: ? Select an answer (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The test statistic The p-value = The p-value is ? a Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 13%. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 12.08% chance of a Type I error. O There is a 12.08% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders differs from 13%.
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 13%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 309 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 31 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a= 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use [Select an answer The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: ? Select an answer H₁: ? Select an answer (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The test statistic The p-value = The p-value is ? a Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 13%. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 12.08% chance of a Type I error. O There is a 12.08% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders differs from 13%.
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8SGR
Related questions
Question
![The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 13%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if
the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 309 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 31 of
them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?
For this study, we should use Select an answer
The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: ? ✓ Select an answer
H₁: ? Select an answer
(please enter a decimal)
(Please enter a decimal)
The test statistic ? ✓ =
The p-value =
The p-value is ? va
Based on this, we should [Select an answer the null hypothesis.
Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01,
so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%.
O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%.
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01,
so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 13%.
Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O There is a 12.08% chance of a Type I error.
O There is a 12.08% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become
repeat offenders differs from 13%.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fdf994888-3eb2-4c1e-b55f-ddb7bf096411%2Fceea1af0-3cd8-41d4-8a8e-f5c581587e83%2Fcz2d1fo_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 13%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if
the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 309 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 31 of
them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?
For this study, we should use Select an answer
The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: ? ✓ Select an answer
H₁: ? Select an answer
(please enter a decimal)
(Please enter a decimal)
The test statistic ? ✓ =
The p-value =
The p-value is ? va
Based on this, we should [Select an answer the null hypothesis.
Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01,
so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%.
O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 13%.
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 13% at a = 0.01,
so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 13%.
Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O There is a 12.08% chance of a Type I error.
O There is a 12.08% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become
repeat offenders differs from 13%.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 1 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
![College Algebra (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305652231/9781305652231_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![College Algebra](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168383/9781938168383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
![College Algebra (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305652231/9781305652231_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![College Algebra](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168383/9781938168383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781680331141/9781680331141_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
![Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780547587776/9780547587776_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL