The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 364 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 33 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: ? v| Select an answer v |(please enter a decimal) H: ? v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? ♥ = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? va f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O There is a 11.91% chance that fewer than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts
become repeat offenders.
O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders
is 9% and if another 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be
a 11.91% chance of concluding that fewer than 11% of convicted sex offender drug addicts
become repeat offenders.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 11% and if another 364 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a
11.91% chance that fewer than 9% of the 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study
become repeat offenders.
O There is a 11% chance of a Type I error.
i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is lower than 11% and if another 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts are
observed then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the
proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to
11%.
O There is a 10% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who
become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 11% and if another 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then
there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of
all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
O There is a 10% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
Transcribed Image Text:h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 11.91% chance that fewer than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 9% and if another 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 11.91% chance of concluding that fewer than 11% of convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 364 inner city residents are surveyed then there would be a 11.91% chance that fewer than 9% of the 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders. O There is a 11% chance of a Type I error. i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11% and if another 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. O There is a 10% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 364 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. O There is a 10% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the
sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 364 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 33 of
them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance?
a. For this study, we should use Select an answer
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: ? v
Select an answer v
(please enter a decimal)
H:? v Select an answer v
(Please enter a decimal)
c. The test statistic ? v =
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value =
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
%3D
e. The p-value is ? va
f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there
is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex
offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
%3D
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so
there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%.
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.
Transcribed Image Text:The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is lower if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 364 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 33 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: ? v Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) H:? v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) %3D e. The p-value is ? va f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. %3D O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is lower than 11%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly lower than 11% at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman