Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
The passage presents two arguments, for and against hosting the Olympics. Write a response analyzing the arguments in the two passages and determining which argument is stronger. Use relevant and specific evidence from the passages to support your response. Take approximately 45 minutes to write your response. Be sure to plan, draft, and evaluate your writing.

The passage presents two arguments, for and against hosting the Olympics. Write a response analyzing the arguments in the two passages and determining which argument is stronger. Use relevant and specific evidence from the passages to support your response. Take approximately 45 minutes to write your response. Be sure to plan, draft, and evaluate your writing.

icon
Related questions
Question

The passage presents two arguments, for and against hosting the Olympics. Write a response analyzing the arguments in the two passages and determining which argument is stronger. Use relevant and specific evidence from the passages to support your response.

Take approximately 45 minutes to write your response. Be sure to plan, draft, and evaluate your

writing.

 

7:32 PM ļ GED Academy Practice Test app.essentialed.com/ed LTE 1 44:10 Study time is being recorded 4 host the Olympics. Hosting the Olympics simply costs too much money to make it worthwhile. Since 1960, the Olympic games have always gone over budget. From 1968 to 2010, the Summer Olympics have cost an average of 252% of their budget. Taxpayers in Brazil paid $11.6 billion for the 2016 Summer Olympics. For a single event, the costs are enormous. In exchange for the extreme costs of hosting the Olympics, countries hope to achieve long-term gain. The truth is that a lot of money goes into building structures that won't be used after the games. When planning the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, the $78 million Olympic Stadium was scheduled to be destroyed immediately after the games. The cost of rebuilding a forest where downhill skiing was held were estimated at $95 million. Large Olympic buildings are not needed after the Olympics are over. They are wasteful and unnecessary. 1/1 35% :
Transcribed Image Text:7:32 PM ļ GED Academy Practice Test app.essentialed.com/ed LTE 1 44:10 Study time is being recorded 4 host the Olympics. Hosting the Olympics simply costs too much money to make it worthwhile. Since 1960, the Olympic games have always gone over budget. From 1968 to 2010, the Summer Olympics have cost an average of 252% of their budget. Taxpayers in Brazil paid $11.6 billion for the 2016 Summer Olympics. For a single event, the costs are enormous. In exchange for the extreme costs of hosting the Olympics, countries hope to achieve long-term gain. The truth is that a lot of money goes into building structures that won't be used after the games. When planning the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, the $78 million Olympic Stadium was scheduled to be destroyed immediately after the games. The cost of rebuilding a forest where downhill skiing was held were estimated at $95 million. Large Olympic buildings are not needed after the Olympics are over. They are wasteful and unnecessary. 1/1 35% :
7:32 PM 4G app.essentialed.com/ed ļ GED Academy Practice Test Passage 1 No Country Should Want to Host the 4 : : Olympics Every two years, a country hosts the Summer or Winter Olympics. Countries apply for the honor of holding the Olympic games and attracting tourists from around the world. Is it worth it? No. Hosting the Olympics is expensive and wasteful, so no country should want to host the Olympics. Hosting the Olympics simply costs too much money to make it worthwhile. Since 1960, the Olympic games have always gone over budget. From 1968 to 2010, the Summer Olympics have cost an average of 252% of their budget. Taxpayers in Brazil paid $11.6 billion for the 2016 Summer Olympics. For a single event, the costs are enormous. 1/1 In exchange for the extreme costs of hosting the Olympics, countries hope to achieve long-term gain. The truth is that a lot of money goes into building structures that won't be used after the games When 44:25 Study time is being recorded 35%
Transcribed Image Text:7:32 PM 4G app.essentialed.com/ed ļ GED Academy Practice Test Passage 1 No Country Should Want to Host the 4 : : Olympics Every two years, a country hosts the Summer or Winter Olympics. Countries apply for the honor of holding the Olympic games and attracting tourists from around the world. Is it worth it? No. Hosting the Olympics is expensive and wasteful, so no country should want to host the Olympics. Hosting the Olympics simply costs too much money to make it worthwhile. Since 1960, the Olympic games have always gone over budget. From 1968 to 2010, the Summer Olympics have cost an average of 252% of their budget. Taxpayers in Brazil paid $11.6 billion for the 2016 Summer Olympics. For a single event, the costs are enormous. 1/1 In exchange for the extreme costs of hosting the Olympics, countries hope to achieve long-term gain. The truth is that a lot of money goes into building structures that won't be used after the games When 44:25 Study time is being recorded 35%
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer