The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let ? denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of H0: ? = 20 versus Ha: ? > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.) (a)n = 17, t = 3.1, ? = 0.05P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context.Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.(b)n = 9, t = 1.7, ? = 0.01P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context.Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.(c)n = 28, t = −0.4P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question. (c) n = 28, t = -0.4P-value =State the conclusion in the problem context.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question. The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let u denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of H: u = 20versus H: µ > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimalplaces.)n USE SALT(a) n = 17, t = 3.1, a = 0.05P-value =State the conclusion in the problem context.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.(b) n = 9, t = 1.7, a = 0.01P-value =State the conclusion in the problem context.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.

From the provided information, The hypotheses are as follow: H0: µ = 20 versus Ha: µ > 20

The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let ? denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paint under consideration. A test of H0: ? = 20 versus Ha: ? > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion is appropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.) (a) n = 17, t = 3.1, ? = 0.05 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (b) n = 9, t = 1.7, ? = 0.01 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. (c) n = 28, t = −0.4 P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20. You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question.