The number of nuclear bombs worldwide began to decrease after the year 1986 (when the number was at an all-time high). The following table indicates the global number of nuclear bombs over the years 1986-1992. The graph shows the corresponding scatter plot and regression line. The equation for the regression line is given below. f(x) = -2631.32x + 5,296,091.04 Year Number of nuclear bombs 1986 69,075 1987 67,302 1988 65,932 1989 63,645 1990 60,642 1991 57,017 1992 53,136 y (Number of warheads) 75,000- 70,000- 65,000- 60,000+ 55,000- 50,000+ 45,000- (Year) (a) Use the regression line to make a projection for the number of nuclear bombs in 1997. (Round the answer to the nearest integer.) nuclear bombs Compute the percentage error, given that the actual number was 36,110. (Round the answer to one decimal place.) (b) In what year might there be only (!) 10,000 nuclear bombs worldwide? Round the answer to the nearest integer.

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285741550
Author:James Stewart
Publisher:James Stewart
Chapter1: Functions And Models
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RCC: (a) What is a function? What are its domain and range? (b) What is the graph of a function? (c) How...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
The number of nuclear bombs worldwide began to decrease after the year 1986 (when the number was at an all-time high). The following table indicates the global number of nuclear bombs over the
years 1986-1992. The graph shows the corresponding scatter plot and regression line. The equation for the regression line is given below.
f(x) = -2631.32x + 5,296,091.04
Year Number of nuclear bombs
1986
69,075
1987
67,302
1988
65,932
1989
63,645
1990
60,642
1991
57,017
1992
53,136
y (Number of warheads)
75,000+
70,000-
65,000-
60,000+
55,000-
50,000+
45,000-
(Year)
(a) Use the regression line to make a projection for the number of nuclear bombs in 1997. (Round the answer to the nearest integer.)
nuclear bombs
Compute the percentage error, given that the actual number was 36,110. (Round the answer to one decimal place.)
(b) In what year might there be only (!) 10,000 nuclear bombs worldwide? Round the answer to the nearest integer.
Transcribed Image Text:The number of nuclear bombs worldwide began to decrease after the year 1986 (when the number was at an all-time high). The following table indicates the global number of nuclear bombs over the years 1986-1992. The graph shows the corresponding scatter plot and regression line. The equation for the regression line is given below. f(x) = -2631.32x + 5,296,091.04 Year Number of nuclear bombs 1986 69,075 1987 67,302 1988 65,932 1989 63,645 1990 60,642 1991 57,017 1992 53,136 y (Number of warheads) 75,000+ 70,000- 65,000- 60,000+ 55,000- 50,000+ 45,000- (Year) (a) Use the regression line to make a projection for the number of nuclear bombs in 1997. (Round the answer to the nearest integer.) nuclear bombs Compute the percentage error, given that the actual number was 36,110. (Round the answer to one decimal place.) (b) In what year might there be only (!) 10,000 nuclear bombs worldwide? Round the answer to the nearest integer.
75,000-
70,000-
65,000-
60,000 -
55,000-
50,000 -
45,000-
(Year)
(a) Use the regression line to make a projection for the number of nuclear bombs in 1997. (Round the answer to the nearest integer.)
nuclear bombs
Compute the percentage error, given that the actual number was 36,110. (Round the answer to one decimal place.)
%
(b) In what year might there be only (!) 10,000 nuclear bombs worldwide? Round the answer to the nearest integer.
If the trend were to continue, in what year would there be no bombs remaining?
Transcribed Image Text:75,000- 70,000- 65,000- 60,000 - 55,000- 50,000 - 45,000- (Year) (a) Use the regression line to make a projection for the number of nuclear bombs in 1997. (Round the answer to the nearest integer.) nuclear bombs Compute the percentage error, given that the actual number was 36,110. (Round the answer to one decimal place.) % (b) In what year might there be only (!) 10,000 nuclear bombs worldwide? Round the answer to the nearest integer. If the trend were to continue, in what year would there be no bombs remaining?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, calculus and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781285741550
Author:
James Stewart
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134438986
Author:
Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:
9780134763644
Author:
William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:
9781319050740
Author:
Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert Franzosa
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Precalculus
Precalculus
Calculus
ISBN:
9780135189405
Author:
Michael Sullivan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus
ISBN:
9781337552516
Author:
Ron Larson, Bruce H. Edwards
Publisher:
Cengage Learning