The Mayor of Chicago is considering two rail transportation projects that you have been asked to evaluate. The first project is for locomotive modifications to improve fuel efficiency across the Chicago regional freight rail network. The project benefits come from fuel cost savings. The second investment project is for Chicago passenger rail infrastructure enhancements such as adding second set of tracks at congested network locations. The Mayor assumes this increased capacity will boost ticket and pass sales and those benefits are shown below. Both projects would provide benefit to the city for the next 30 years. Based upon the level of investment risk, the city Treasurer has suggested that financing could be secured at an annual rate of 7%. A number of alternatives have been developed for each project. The lump sum of the initial cash outlay and the ongoing monthly benefits have been estimated for each alternative and are shown in the following tables: Freight Rail Network Monthly Benefit ($K) Investment Alternative ($K) FO* 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 24.95 56.56 79.84 89.82 F1 F2 F3 F4 Passenger Rail Network Investment Monthly Benefit ($K) Alternative (SK) PO* P1 P2 P3 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 29.94 51.56 66.53 73.18 P4 FO* and PO* are the "do-nothing" alternatives for the Freight and Passenger Networks respectively. For parts a, b, and c consider only the costs and benefits that have been converted to dollar terms.
The Mayor of Chicago is considering two rail transportation projects that you have been asked to evaluate. The first project is for locomotive modifications to improve fuel efficiency across the Chicago regional freight rail network. The project benefits come from fuel cost savings. The second investment project is for Chicago passenger rail infrastructure enhancements such as adding second set of tracks at congested network locations. The Mayor assumes this increased capacity will boost ticket and pass sales and those benefits are shown below. Both projects would provide benefit to the city for the next 30 years. Based upon the level of investment risk, the city Treasurer has suggested that financing could be secured at an annual rate of 7%. A number of alternatives have been developed for each project. The lump sum of the initial cash outlay and the ongoing monthly benefits have been estimated for each alternative and are shown in the following tables: Freight Rail Network Monthly Benefit ($K) Investment Alternative ($K) FO* 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 24.95 56.56 79.84 89.82 F1 F2 F3 F4 Passenger Rail Network Investment Monthly Benefit ($K) Alternative (SK) PO* P1 P2 P3 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 29.94 51.56 66.53 73.18 P4 FO* and PO* are the "do-nothing" alternatives for the Freight and Passenger Networks respectively. For parts a, b, and c consider only the costs and benefits that have been converted to dollar terms.
Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
Related questions
Question
Given the scope of each project, what other costs and/or benefits might not be fully captured in the tables above? That is, a cost and/or benefit that might not be accurately reduced to dollar terms.
Transcribed Image Text:The Mayor of Chicago is considering two rail transportation projects that you have been asked to evaluate. The first project
is for locomotive modifications to improve fuel efficiency across the Chicago regional freight rail network. The
project benefits come from fuel cost savings. The second investment project is for Chicago passenger rail
infrastructure enhancements such as adding second set of tracks at congested network locations. The Mayor assumes
this increased capacity will boost ticket and pass sales and those benefits are shown below. Both projects would
provide benefit to the city for the next 30 years. Based upon the level of investment risk, the city Treasurer has
suggested that financing could be secured at an annual rate of 7%. A number of alternatives have been developed for
each project. The lump sum of the initial cash outlay and the ongoing monthly benefits have been estimated for each
alternative and are shown in the following tables:
Freight Rail Network
Monthly
Benefit ($K)
Investment
Alternative
(SK)
F0*
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
24.95
56.56
79.84
89.82
F1
F2
F3
F4
Passenger Rail Network
Investment
Monthly
Benefit ($K)
Alternative
|($K)
PO*
3,000
6,000
9,000
12,000
29.94
P1
P2
P3
P4
51.56
66.53
73.18
FO* and PO* are the "do-nothing" alternatives for the Freight and Passenger Networks respectively.
For parts a, b, and c consider only the costs and benefits that have been converted to dollar terms.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education