### Ligand-Field Stabilization Energies (LFSE) OverviewThis table presents the ligand-field-stabilization energies (LFSE) in cm⁻¹ for three pairs of metal complexes, denoted as \([ML_6]^{3+}\) and \([ML_6]^{2+}\). These complexes are considered to understand the differences in LFSE between reduced (\([ML_6]^{2+}\)) and oxidized (\([ML_6]^{3+}\)) states. Below is the tabulated data reflecting the given energies:| Complex | \(\Delta_0\) (cm⁻¹) ||---------------------|----------------------|| \([Co(H_2O)_6]^{3+}\) | 16,750 || \([Co(H_2O)_6]^{2+}\) | 8,400 || \([Mn(H_2O)_6]^{3+}\) | 15,800 || \([Mn(H_2O)_6]^{2+}\) | 7,850 || \([Fe(H_2O)_6]^{3+}\) | 14,000 || \([Fe(H_2O)_6]^{2+}\) | 9,350 |**Task:** Calculate the difference in LFSE for each pair, assuming \([ML_6]^{3+}\) complexes are low-spin and \([ML_6]^{2+}\) complexes are high-spin. The differences in LFSE should be arranged in increasing order of magnitude in cm⁻¹.### Possible Order of LFSE DifferencesHere are the given options for arranging the differences, in increasing magnitude:- **A:** \(5,500\) (Fe\(^{2+}\)/Fe\(^{3+}\)) < \(9,580\) (Mn\(^{2+}\)/Mn\(^{3+}\)) < \(25,080\) (Co\(^{2+}\)/Co\(^{3+}\))- **B:** \(560\) (Fe\(^{2+}\)/Fe\(^{3+}\)) < \(25,080\) (Co\(^{2+}\)/Co\(^{3+}\)) < \(25,280\) (Mn\(^{2+}\)/Mn\(^{

For octahedral complexes: For a high spin complex the energy gap between t2g and eg is less but for…

The ligand-field-stabilization-energies (LFSE) of three pairs of [ML«]³" and [ML«J* complexes are given in the following table. Calculate the difference in LFSE for each pair of reduced and oxidized complexes, that is, the differences in LFSE between [ML«J²" and [ML6]*", assuming [ML6]* complexes are low-spin complexes and [ML«J?* complexes are high-spin complexes. Arrange the differences in cm' in order of increase in magnitude. A, (cm') (Co(H;O)«}³* [Co(H;O)«J** [Mn(H;O)«]* [Mn(H;O)«]** 16,750 8,400 15,800 7,850 [Fe(H,O)«]** 14,000 [Fe(H;O),J** 9,350 A. 5,500 (Fe²"/Fe") < 9,580 (Mn²"/Mn³")< 25,080 (Co²"/Co³") B. 5,560 (Fe²"/Fe") < 25,080 (Co²"/Co³") < 25,280 (Mn²"/Mn³") C. -20 (Co²"/Co³") < -3,740 (Fe²"/Fe³") < 25,280 (Mn²"/Mn³") D. 24,260 (Fe²"/Fe³") < 25,280 (Mn²"/Mn³") < 33,480 (Co²"/Co") E. 9,480 (Mn²"/Mn'") < 24,260 (Fe²"/Fe³") < 33,480 (Co²"/Co³")

The ligand-field-stabilization-energies (LFSE) of three pairs of [ML«]³" and [ML«J* complexes are given in the following table. Calculate the difference in LFSE for each pair of reduced and oxidized complexes, that is, the differences in LFSE between [ML«J²" and [ML6]", assuming [ML6] complexes are low-spin complexes and [ML«J?* complexes are high-spin complexes. Arrange the differences in cm' in order of increase in magnitude. A, (cm') (Co(H;O)«}³* [Co(H;O)«J** [Mn(H;O)«]* [Mn(H;O)«] 16,750 8,400 15,800 7,850 [Fe(H,O)«] 14,000 [Fe(H;O),J** 9,350 A. 5,500 (Fe²"/Fe") < 9,580 (Mn²"/Mn³")< 25,080 (Co²"/Co³") B. 5,560 (Fe²"/Fe") < 25,080 (Co²"/Co³") < 25,280 (Mn²"/Mn³") C. -20 (Co²"/Co³") < -3,740 (Fe²"/Fe³") < 25,280 (Mn²"/Mn³") D. 24,260 (Fe²"/Fe³") < 25,280 (Mn²"/Mn³") < 33,480 (Co²"/Co") E. 9,480 (Mn²"/Mn'") < 24,260 (Fe²"/Fe³") < 33,480 (Co²"/Co³")

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Elimination of an L ligand (as the first step of a D substitution mechanism) from a charge - neutral NiL4 complex has very little tendency to occur for L = P(OMe3), but for L = PMe3, it occurs almost completely. Since the two ligand species have approximately the same cone angle, what factors are responsible for this difference?
Please send me the question in 20 minutes it's very urgent plz find
a) Draw the lewis structure of the nitrate ion and discuss its potential to serve as an ambidentate ligand. b) Why did Jorgensen and Werner identify the complex cation [Co(NH3)5No3]2+ aws definitely containing five Co3+ - N and one Co3+ - O interactions?
Q 2. Comment on the Kinetic and thermodynamic stability of metal complexes? (2 marks) (a) Which complex is kinetically labile or inert according to crystal field theory? H₂O OH2 OH2 * H₂O NECHI Mn OH2 OH2 4- 2+ [+] NEC CEN CEN (b) Which complex is most thermodynamically stable and why? Calculate log ẞ to determine stability? H3N 2+ _NH3] 2 [NC-Ag-CN]] NH3 3+ H3N... H3N ,,NH3 Cr NH3 H3N NH3 NH3 K 1.0 x10¹² K 5.4 x 1018 K=2.0 × 105
6) Complexes with five d electrons (d) are sometimes tetrahedral and sometimes octahedral. Consider the high-spin complexes [FeCl] and [FeCI]-. Knowing the splitting energy of the octahedral complex A.= 11000 cm-, deduce that corresponding to the tetrahedralA,(cm-1) 3= ( five significant figures)
6.) a.) In the series of Werner complexes (after the German-Swiss chemist) [CoX(NH3)5]* with X = I', Cl', NH3, there is a color variation from purple (I'), through pink (CI') to yellow (NH3). Explain this observation. b.) The same transition metal ion can provide a different color to different host lattices. Red ruby consists of an Al203 corundum host structure where Cr3+ dopants occupy octahedral sites surrounded by 02. In green emeralds, however, Cr3+ acts as a dopant of the beryl (Be3Al2(SiO3)6) host, wherein it occupies octahedral sites, surrounded by six silicate ions. With this information, determine whether the silicate anions impose a stronger or weaker ligand field compared to 02. Explain your reasoning.
Regarding reactions and mechanisms of coordination compounds, complete and balance the equations below. Unless otherwise stated, the reactions proceed at room temperature in water solution. AgCl + S,0,? [Ni(NH3)6]* +CN→ [Co(H,O)6]** + NH3 + NHẠC1 + SeO2 2- fast [Cr(NH3);H¿O]³+ + OH¯ cold water heat [RHCI(NH3)s]? * + Hg²* +H,O
7. Do you expect any tetragonal (Jahn Teller) distortion of the following complexes. Draw and give the name for each complex. a) K[Cr(C,O4)(H;0)(NH;)}].3H;O b) [Co(en)2(CO):] Cl2 c) [Rh(NO2)2(NH3)2](NO3)
Characterize each of t Following CooXDivation comprends M₂₂ [Cr CH₂U) (CN)x] [M(NH3)3B [Mn (HD)₂ ((₂0)₂ Isonization splere coordination sphere CENTRal intal Ich Lyses slence لا سال Uslesce
What is the spin-only magnetic moment for the [NiCl4]Cl2 complex?
What is the ligand field stabilization energy for a high spin d6 complex in terms of Δ0?
2. Consider a hypothetical trigonal bipyramidal Fe(III) complex [FeF2(OH)3]². We need to divide the five donor atoms of the ligands into two groups: 2F and 30. F HO FeOH F OH (a) Identify the point group of the complex and assign x, y, and z to it. (b) Indicate the symmetries of the Fe valence orbitals, i.e., 3d, 4s, and 4p. (c) Derive the symmetries and expressions of the two F σ-SALCs, considering that each F. atom contributes one 2p orbital with a lone pair to form the σ-SALCs. (d) Derive the symmetries and expressions of the three σ-SALCs on the OH ligands, considering that each O atom contributes one 2p orbital with a lone pair to form the σ- SALCs. (e) Draw a σ bonding-only MO energy level diagram for the complex, mark the MOs with symmetry labels, and fill the MOS with the valence electrons. (f) Consider each O atom contributing one perpendicular 2p orbital to form π-SALCs. Derive the symmetries of the three л-SALCS. (g) Identify the MOs in (e) with which the O л-SALCs interact,…