The government allows sulphur dioxide emissions of 4 parts per billion and has a tradable permits program. The 2 firms in the market pollute at a rate of 5 parts per billion and 6 parts per billion respectively. The 2 firms have the following costs to reduce emissions. The least expensive way to reach the government’s mandate is: Reduction of Sulphur Dioxide Cost - Firm 1 Cost - Firm 2 By 1 part per billion $200,000/year $80,000/year By 2 parts per billion $420,000/year $200,000/year By 3 parts per billion $700,000/year $340,000/year By 4 parts per billion $1,200,000/year $650,000/year Group of answer choices $400,000. $200,000. $340,000.

There is a company that emits a moderate amount of fossil fuel emissions. It would cost them 10 dollars to reduce emissions by 1 tonne, an additional 15 dollars to reduce emissions by a second tonne, an additional 25 dollars to reduce emissions by a third tonne, an additional 30 dollars to reduce emissions by a fourth tonne, and an additional 100 dollars to reduce emissions for a fifth tonne. If the price for a 1 tonne of emissions in a cap-and-trade program is 25 dollars, how many tonnes of emissions is the company likely to reduce?   a. one tonne b. two tonnes c. three tonnes d. four tonnes c. 5 tonnes

A firm has a marginal emissions benefit of 100-0.5*E in each of 2 years, where E measures emissions in tons. The marginal cost of emissions to society is 75/ton. The discount rate is 10% and the marginal cost of emissions also grows at 10% per year. The government decides to give the firm permits to emit 50 tons of emissions per year, but allows the firm to "bank" or "borrow" permits across the two years so that this effectively acts as a 100 ton cap on emissions over 2 years. How much will the firm emit in each year? If all firms are identical to the one you analyze here, is the government issuing too many or too few emission permits relative to the efficient level? How do you know?

How do​ taxes, pollution​ charges, and​ cap-and-trade work to reduce​ emissions?     Taxes and pollution charges​ _______.

Two firms, Kegareta Incorporated and Sucio Enterprises, have access to five production processes, each one of which has a different cost and gives off a different amount of pollution. The daily costs of the processes and the corresponding number of tons of smoke emitted are shown in the accompanying table. Kegareta Incorporated Sucio Enterprises A B D E C 4 tons/day 3 tons/day 2 tons/day 1 tons/day 0 tons/day $ 40 120 $ 85 175 $ 135 250 $ 190 345 $ 250 460 If the government requires each firm to cut its emissions by 25 percent, the total cost of this policy to the society is $

Econ Return to Activity Score Mentor Mega Beans Market Booming Berries Booming Berries Materials Mark, if the external marginal cost from Booming Berries is $20 per thousand pounds, what is the socially efficient price per pound? 130 Booming Berrles 120 Clare 110 100 $70 90 80 70 Mark 60 That is correct! 50 40 30 Econ 20 Mentor 10 Mark, if the external marginal cost from Booming Berries is $20 per thousand pounds, what is the socially efficient quantity (in thousands)? 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Quantity (in thousands) Clare Enter a response then click Submit below (in thousands) Submit MacBook Air F12 FI1 F9 F10 F8 F7 F6 888 F4 F5 F3 F2 esc F1 * & 24 % 8 @ # 7 3 4 2 T E Q tab Price (per pound)

In a market for tradable discharge permits, the buying and selling of permits determines · the aggregate pollution level the equilibrium permit price the allocation of abatement costs d. both (b) and (c) but not (a)

Describe the key symmetry between a pollution emissions tax and an emissions trading scheme. Outline some reasons you might wish to choose one approach in favour of the other when dealing with an emissions-reduction problem.

Cost and benefit (thousands of dollars per concert) MSC 100 80 60 40 20 0 5 A) 0. B) 5. (C) 10. D) 20. E) 15. 15 MC MB 10 20 25 Quantity (concerts per year) 39) The figure above illustrates the marginal private cost and the marginal social cost to the city of Halifax for each rock concert that is offered. It also illustrates the marginal private benefit. There is no external benefit. The efficient number of concerts in Halifax is

My dear hero pro expert Hand written solution is not allowed.