The following two transactions result in a deadlock. Show through examples how this deadlock can be dealt with or avoided using conservative and basic two-phase locking algorithms. T1 read_lock (Y); read_item (Y); write_lock (X); (waits for X) T'2 read_lock (X); read_item (X); write_lock (Y); (waits for Y)

The following two transactions result in a deadlock. Show through examples how this deadlock can be dealt with or avoided using conservative and basic two-phase locking algorithms. T1 read_lock (Y); read_item (Y); write_lock (X); (waits for X) T'2 read_lock (X); read_item (X); write_lock (Y); (waits for Y)

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

B: List and describe strategies for handling Deadlock after it occurs.
Is it less expensive to avoid deadlocks than to let them to occur and then realize they exist?
Resources are made available to those who have achieved a stalemate as a result of the deadlock detection procedure.
A straightforward technique of avoiding deadlock is to avoid the occurrence of..............
What is the difference between trying to prevent a deadlock and actually breaking one?
What are thescenarios where deadlock can occur specify each?
What's the Difference Between Trying to Prevent a Deadlock and Trying to Avoid One?
What are the four necessary conditions for a deadlock to happen?
5aaa
Obviously, it's cheaper to prevent deadlocks from occurring than it is to identify them after they've already occurred, but when is this the case?
Is it feasible to identify the difference between preventing deadlock and avoiding deadlock?
Is it really possible to make a distinction between avoiding deadlocks and preventing them from occurring in the first place?