Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
The following table lists highway miles (in MPG) and weight (in pounds) for a variety of cars, foreign and domestic (same data as before). CAR HWY WEIGHT Chev. Cavalier 31 2795 Lincoln Cont. 24 3930 Mitsubishi Eclipse 33 3235 Olds. Aurora 26 3995 Pontiac Grand Am 30 3115 Chev. Corvette 28 3220 BMW 3-Series 27 3225 Ford Crown Victoria 24 3985 Hyundai Accent If we let x be the weight and y be the Highway MPG, and we used Excel to compute the equation of the Least- Square regression line (which comes out to be y = -0.00672'x + 51.1156) as well as the correlation coefficient (which comes out to be -0.89). Then you used that equation to predict that the Highway Miles for a car that weighs just 1000 pounds would be 44.4 mpg. 37 2290 O Ithink this prediction is accurate because the person used Excel for the computation. I think this prediction is not accurate since a car that weighs 1000 pounds is not part of the original data list. I think this prediction is not accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient is not equal to 1. O Ithink this prediction is accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient of -0.89 indicates a strong linear relation between x and y.

The following table lists highway miles (in MPG) and weight (in pounds) for a variety of cars, foreign and domestic (same data as before). CAR HWY WEIGHT Chev. Cavalier 31 2795 Lincoln Cont. 24 3930 Mitsubishi Eclipse 33 3235 Olds. Aurora 26 3995 Pontiac Grand Am 30 3115 Chev. Corvette 28 3220 BMW 3-Series 27 3225 Ford Crown Victoria 24 3985 Hyundai Accent If we let x be the weight and y be the Highway MPG, and we used Excel to compute the equation of the Least- Square regression line (which comes out to be y = -0.00672'x + 51.1156) as well as the correlation coefficient (which comes out to be -0.89). Then you used that equation to predict that the Highway Miles for a car that weighs just 1000 pounds would be 44.4 mpg. 37 2290 O Ithink this prediction is accurate because the person used Excel for the computation. I think this prediction is not accurate since a car that weighs 1000 pounds is not part of the original data list. I think this prediction is not accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient is not equal to 1. O Ithink this prediction is accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient of -0.89 indicates a strong linear relation between x and y.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
The following table lists highway miles (in MPG) and weight (in pounds) for a variety of cars, foreign and domestic (same data as before). CAR HWY WEIGHT Chev. Cavalier 31 2795 Lincoln Cont. 24 3930 Mitsubishi Eclipse 33 3235 Olds. Aurora 26 3995 Pontiac Grand Am 30 3115 Chev. Corvette 28 3220 BMW 3-Series 27 3225 Ford Crown Victoria 24 3985 Hyundai Accent If we let x be the weight and y be the Highway MPG, and we used Excel to compute the equation of the Least- 37 2290 Square regression line (which comes out to be y = -0.00672'x + 51.1156) as well as the correlation coefficient (which comes out to be -0.89). Then you used that equation to predict that the Highway Miles for a car that weighs just 1000 pounds would be 44.4 mpg. I think this prediction is accurate because the person used Excel for the computation. O I think this prediction is not accurate since a car that weighs 1000 pounds is not part of the original data list. O Ithink this prediction is not accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient is not equal to 1. O I think this prediction is accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient of -0.89 indicates a strong linear relation between x and y.
Transcribed Image Text:The following table lists highway miles (in MPG) and weight (in pounds) for a variety of cars, foreign and domestic (same data as before). CAR HWY WEIGHT Chev. Cavalier 31 2795 Lincoln Cont. 24 3930 Mitsubishi Eclipse 33 3235 Olds. Aurora 26 3995 Pontiac Grand Am 30 3115 Chev. Corvette 28 3220 BMW 3-Series 27 3225 Ford Crown Victoria 24 3985 Hyundai Accent If we let x be the weight and y be the Highway MPG, and we used Excel to compute the equation of the Least- 37 2290 Square regression line (which comes out to be y = -0.00672'x + 51.1156) as well as the correlation coefficient (which comes out to be -0.89). Then you used that equation to predict that the Highway Miles for a car that weighs just 1000 pounds would be 44.4 mpg. I think this prediction is accurate because the person used Excel for the computation. O I think this prediction is not accurate since a car that weighs 1000 pounds is not part of the original data list. O Ithink this prediction is not accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient is not equal to 1. O I think this prediction is accurate because the person used the equation of a least-square regression line and the correlation coefficient of -0.89 indicates a strong linear relation between x and y.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS